So far, I see absolutely no reason to replace my LCP ll with a MAX, and no one seems to be able to give me one.What are you talking about LCP for when LCP Max is out? It is obsolete now. The LCP line is a line of belly busters. Up close and personal get off me defense guns. I carry the Max every day. Throw some good name brand hollow points in there and you are good to go. I use the Ruger pocket holster than came with it until I decide to by a $30 sticky holster. If I were a perp, id throw my hands up just a quick to an lcp as I would an AK. The equality movement is real when it comes to taking a bullet.
Oops. Misunderstanding. My LCP ll s are of both calibers , though I favor the ,22 with a 10 round mag. As for the other, the extra 4 rounds aren't worth buying a new handgun and putting this one away. Yes, the extra 4 rounds are a good selling point if I was looking at new handguns, but not if I already have the LCP ll. If I can't stop it in six, ten won't help. Multiple attacker shoot-out you say? Who says I only carry one firearm?The Max is barely larger and holds x4 more rounds. Assuming you don't care or consider 7rds enough for a self defense encounter in which you have to deploy and discharge a firearm. That's not actually the point though. The point is know you can have extra firepower in the same package. Knowing this and still deciding not to do that is just ridiculous.
Exactly! Who doesn't carry a spare mag or two? Sorry, not worth switching to the MAX. Again, if I didn't already have LCP ll the MAX would be a good buy. I mean, I have firearms that hold multiple rounds, but does that mean I should ditch my 2 shot back-up derringer?Mg LCP II is 7+1. I have two loaded additional magazines. That is 22 rounds. If I need more ammo then that then I am in a war zone.