The New Vaquero will take +P 45 Loads per Ruger(do not try)

Help Support Ruger Forum:

JohnnyRingo

Bearcat
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
28
Rick Courtright":uj6ok7m9 said:
JohnnyRingo":uj6ok7m9 said:
its funny how ruger calls there stainless vaqueros "high polished", when there not. when i sent one of my old models in to have some work done on it, i requested that they do a high polish on it...now it is one of the nicest looking and shooting old models ive ever owned


"Old Model" = original Blackhawk, w/ three screws thru the frame, marked on frame "Blackhawk" ("Old Model" being common usage to describe the "original" BH series--it's not stamped anywhere. Sometimes also commonly referred to as "3 screw") Came from the factory w/o transfer bar mechanism; may have been "converted" to the t/b at the factory

(im going to use caps to differentiate my answers from your questions,so you know im not shouting!...LOL)

YES, THESE WOULD BE REFERRED TO AS "OLD MODEL" IN MY BOOK. THEY WOULD HAVE THE NAME OF THE GUN SUCH AS BLACKHAWK,VAQUERO,SINGLE SIX,ECT STAMPED ON THE FRAME, BUT WOULDNT BE HAVE THE WORDS "OLD MODEL" THAT IS JUST THE MOST COMMON WAY TO REFER TO THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL MODEL AND THE "NEW MODEL" GUNS

"New Model" = New Model Blackhawk (NMBH), pins instead of screws, marked on frame "New Model Blackhawk". Came from the factory

YES, THAT WOULD BE CORRECT!

"Bisley" = variant of NMBH, marked on frame "New Model Blackhawk"

YEP!

"Vaquero" = variant of NMBH, marked on frame "New Model Blackhawk" (there is NO "Old Vaquero" either stamped or in common usage.)

NO, THE VAQUERO IS MARKED ON THE FRAME "VAQUERO" FOR WHAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED THE "OLD MODEL" AND "NEW MODEL VAQUERO" FOR THE NEW MODEL GUNS. THE OLD MODEL VAQUERO IS ACTUALLY A MODIFIED BLACKHAWK FRAME, AND CAN GENERALLY TAKE ANY LOAD DATA YOU CAN SAFELY SHOOT THRU THE BLACKHAWK, GENERALLY MARKED AS "RUGER AND T/C ONLY LOADS" IN MOST BOOKS

"New Vaquero" = variant of NMBH, marked on frame "New Vaquero"

YEP!

Old model, and these three variants of the New Model are built on the heavy frame, heavy cylinder blueprints. Reloading data listed as "Ruger Only" applies to these models.

YES. WHEN YOUR LOOKING THRU RELOADING DATA, AND COME ACROSS DATA THAT SAYS "RUGER ONLY" WHAT THERE GENERALLY REFERRING TO IS THE "OLD MODEL" OR "ORIGINAL MODEL" GUNS,USUALLY IN 45 COLT.

New Vaquero is built on a lighter frame, lighter cylinder blueprint. Reloading data listed as "Ruger Only" does NOT apply to these models.

YES, THAT IS ALSO TRUE, BUT I THINK THATS WHAT THIS WHOLE THREAD WAS STARTED OVER. THERE IS CONTROVERSY OVER WHAT LOADS WOULD BE SAFE IN THE "NEW MODEL VAQUERO" IN 45 COLT. THE OLDER MODELS ARE BEEFIER, AND CAN HANDLE MUCH HIGHER PRESSURED ROUNDS THAN THE NEW MODEL GUNS IN 45 COLT. THAT SAID, AS I SAID IN A PREVIOUS POST, I HAVE FIRED SOME PRETTY STOUT LOADS IN MY NEW MODEL WITHOUT DAMAGE, BUT I WOULDNT RECOMEND DOING SO WITH ANY REGULARITY! I EVEN WENT AS FAR MYSELF AS TO ORDER A LARGE BATCH OF NICKEL PLATED 45 LC BRASS JUST SPECIFICALLY FOR MY HIGHER PRESSURE LOADS I SHOOT IN MY "OLD MODEL" OR "ORIGINAL" MODEL VAQUEROS AND BLACKHAWKS,ECT. THAT WAY, EVEN THOUGH I USE THE SAME BULLET, I CAN TELL AT A GLANCE IF IM LOADING THE CORRECT AMMO FOR THE CORRECT GUN (OLD MODEL-NICKEL, NEW MODEL-BRASS)



YOU HAVE TO ALSO REMEBER, THAT WHEN THIS ISSUE USUALLY COMES UP IN THE RELOADING CIRCLES, IT IS REFERRING SPECIFICALLY TO THE 45 COLT. THE 357 OLD AND NEW MODELS ARE BOTH STOUT ENOUGH TO SHOOT SOME PRETTY INCREDIBLE STUFF THRU. IN LOOKING AT THE OLD MODEL VAQUERO 357, IM AFRAID YOUD HAVE TO REALLY SCREW THE POOCH WHEN RELOADING FOR IT TO SHOOT SOMETHING THRU IT THATS STOUT ENOUGH TO DAMAGE IT. I DONT KNOW IT FOR A FACT, BUT ID PROBABLY BET THAT THE CYLINDER IN THE OPRIGINAL 357 BLACKHAWK AND VAQUERO ACCOUNTS FOR A HUGE PART OF THE WEIGHT TO THE GUN.

(one thing i do have to say though, i also spoke to ruger about the issue of the higher pressured rounds thru the new model vaquero 45 colt, and they did tell me that the new model is ok to shoot regular ammo, +P and +P+ ammunition thru. while i do agree there isnt any sort of "standard" for those for 45 colt,i do know just from taking to gloria over at ruger that they proof the guns at about triple + cowboy load pressures....i just went thru all of this recently with an old model vaquero i sent back to them to have a new sight blade installed on. long story short, somehow when they proofed the gun at the factory after the repair ( they told me they proof all guns,new,used,repaired,ect before they leave the factory as a CYA procedure) they cracked my cylinder. when i got it back, after 7 rounds of magtech cowboy loads, the cylinder cracked thru and i had to have it sent back and a new cylinder fit,no charge of course!). so point being, while i wouldnt shoot those kind of loads continually thru my new models, they will take higher than cowboy load pressures.

hope i answered some of your questions.
 

JohnnyRingo

Bearcat
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Messages
28
one more thing. they (ruger) did mention NOT to shoot buffalo bores 300gr'ers. they said the pressures from that round are WAY EXTREME, and WILL damage new model guns.

i think buffalo bore does make several loads now specifically designed for the new model 45 colt vaquero
 

Rclark

Hunter
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
3,547
Location
Butte, MT
errr, what is so tough about:

1) There are Old Models (pre-1973 3 screw) and the New Models (1973+ with transfer bar). That should be easy to remember.... You have A .... or ... B . Not C or D, and combinations of them.... Just TWO choices....

2) There is the Vaquero in 45 Colt and New Vaquero in 45 Colt. Again you have A .... or ... B. And since they both have transfer bars they are "New Models" . Simple.... Just TWO choices.

Soooo, just use the correct terminology and we can 'understand' each other.
 

COLT_45

Single-Sixer
Joined
May 16, 2011
Messages
202
Location
Ponderosa Territory, USA
Thought maybe now that a few years have passed (2012 almost here)
that this discussion might continue-very informative.....

I would bet some folks might want to add to the discussion as the New
Vaquero 45 has become so popular and has been in use now for many years.

Example-I've shot the Buffalo Bore 255 Heavy Standard Pressures from my
Montado 45 on several occasions and have experienced no problems....
 

rsc

Bearcat
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
13
I read this thread all the way through last winter and would also like to know what the latest consensus is. Especially after reading Pierce's article in the latest (december) issue of Handloader magazine. I wonder how he came up with those 23,000PSI loads, did he have stress test equipement on the cylinders? If he says that 23,000 is safe in the NV then I feel pretty good about a 20,000 load as a max for my own NV.
 

BB Rvlr

Single-Sixer
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
204
Location
Michigan
rsc said:
I read this thread all the way through last winter and would also like to know what the latest consensus is. Especially after reading Pierce's article in the latest (december) issue of Handloader magazine. I wonder how he came up with those 23,000PSI loads, did he have stress test equipement on the cylinders? If he says that 23,000 is safe in the NV then I feel pretty good about a 20,000 load as a max for my own NV.

Brian Pierce stated right in the article (page 57, center column) that he called Ruger and asked if .45 ACP +P is acceptable and they stated that it was. He got the 23,000 psi figure because this is the max for .45 ACP +P and the .45 Colt cylinder is almost dimensionally identical.
 

rsc

Bearcat
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
13
BB Rvlr said:
rsc said:
I read this thread all the way through last winter and would also like to know what the latest consensus is. Especially after reading Pierce's article in the latest (december) issue of Handloader magazine. I wonder how he came up with those 23,000PSI loads, did he have stress test equipement on the cylinders? If he says that 23,000 is safe in the NV then I feel pretty good about a 20,000 load as a max for my own NV.

Brian Pierce stated right in the article (page 57, center column) that he called Ruger and asked if .45 ACP +P is acceptable and they stated that it was. He got the 23,000 psi figure because this is the max for .45 ACP +P and the .45 Colt cylinder is almost dimensionally identical.

Well, I believe that he DID call Ruger and get that info, but my question is directed to how he came to decide when his loads had reached 23,000psi ( or thereabouts) for his max loads. I expect that he didn't pull those loads from a hat. Were these loads instrumented or did he read primers and feel for stiff ejectors? Seems like you dont find that equipment at the local Woolworths. Seems you have to be pretty sure about your data to put it in print.
 

BB Rvlr

Single-Sixer
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
204
Location
Michigan
rsc said:
BB Rvlr said:
rsc said:
I read this thread all the way through last winter and would also like to know what the latest consensus is. Especially after reading Pierce's article in the latest (december) issue of Handloader magazine. I wonder how he came up with those 23,000PSI loads, did he have stress test equipement on the cylinders? If he says that 23,000 is safe in the NV then I feel pretty good about a 20,000 load as a max for my own NV.

Brian Pierce stated right in the article (page 57, center column) that he called Ruger and asked if .45 ACP +P is acceptable and they stated that it was. He got the 23,000 psi figure because this is the max for .45 ACP +P and the .45 Colt cylinder is almost dimensionally identical.

Well, I believe that he DID call Ruger and get that info, but my question is directed to how he came to decide when his loads had reached 23,000psi ( or thereabouts) for his max loads. I expect that he didn't pull those loads from a hat. Were these loads instrumented or did he read primers and feel for stiff ejectors? Seems like you dont find that equipment at the local Woolworths. Seems you have to be pretty sure about your data to put it in print.

rsc: I apologize for not reading your question thoroughly. You present a good question.
 

tek4260

Buckeye
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1,886
Location
carroll county ms
http://www.castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?t=136404

Here is a recent discussion on the New Vaquero, somewhat along the same lines
 

Rclark

Hunter
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
3,547
Location
Butte, MT
He got the 23,000 psi figure because this is the max for .45 ACP +P
And we now have the Lispey .45 convertibles (.45 Colt/.45 ACP) ... same medium frame as the New Vaquero.... And so it goes.... I am confident that the medium frame can easily handle Tier 2 loads as defined by Brian Pearce, but not Ruger Only Loads.... End of story (for me) :) . If we want Ruger Only Loads we have the large frame .45 Colt BHs to handle that chore.
 

Latest posts

Top