Cheesewhiz":2azjimdv said:
There are many pistols that deserve a cult following, 1911's, Browning HP's, Sig 200 series and CZ 75 series to name some. In my opinion, a Glock has all the personality of a sponge as most polymer pistols do, I own an SR9, it's a good gun but one striker fired polymer pistol is more than enough for me. I don't even think a Glock is still the best polymer pistol out there anymore even if I liked it's crappy grip, JMHO.
My preference for steel and wood over plastic has been well covered. That said, I've owned four Glocks, still own one, and think they're a modern classic. There are two pistols I could probably detail strip blindfolded: A 1911 and a Glock. The designs of both are simple and elegant, without any more parts than are necessary (39 in one case and 41 in the other, I believe). They're good guns. I'd still like to see one after about 75 years of exposure to UV and ozone, but I won't be around that long.
There are "improvements" to the basic Glock design, like the XD, but I'd be hard pressed to say they were "better". Having just shopped for hi-cap .45s I tried out the XD, M&P, new Glock 21SF ("slim frame" - it's not) -- and didn't find anything that really jumped out at me. That's how I ended up with a RIA hi-cap 1911...
As for large and uncomfortable: My vote goes to the H&K USP. I really want to like this gun because of the trigger system, capacity, etc. But it feels like holding a 2x4 with squared-off edges. The $40 magazines don't help.
That's another good thing with Glocks: Aftermarket support. Cheap and plentiful parts.
But they still can't replace my Sigs. In fact, I've recently come to realize I'm more comfortable carrying my P220 than a 1911.
-- Sam