radshop
Bearcat
As a young man I read a couple of the classic Parker crime novels written in the 60s by Richard Stark. Now I have the whole series on audio and have enjoyed listening to the first couple in order. The subject matter naturally includes a lot of guns. Then out of nowhere one of the criminal crew hasn't "taken off the safety of his revolver". SMH. (The gun was probably a S&W .38, but not totally clear as it was one of several acquired for the job.)
I wasn't listening with the intent to critique how he portrayed guns, but overall he seemed to know his stuff. But after that bungle, I'm questioning a few other things. One of the things I noted was the prevalence of small caliber handguns among career criminals when going into situations where they expect violence: there's plenty of .38 special, but a surprising amount of .22 & .32, plus maybe a few odd calibers in between. The time period is the 50s-60s, and I know there's been some caliber inflation over the decades of what people think is necessary. But I would think that .38 special at the low end, and more often .357 mag & 45 ACP would be the go-to calibers among the violent crowd. Any thoughts on the reality of what was normal for that time period?
Another thing that bugs me is the prevalence of guys using a gun to bonk somebody on the head. From my knowledge, nobody who knows guns as working tools would go around doing that. I recall Elmer Keith describing bent barrels, broken grip frames, and other damage incurred from that kind of thing. Not to mention risk of negligent discharge.
I wasn't listening with the intent to critique how he portrayed guns, but overall he seemed to know his stuff. But after that bungle, I'm questioning a few other things. One of the things I noted was the prevalence of small caliber handguns among career criminals when going into situations where they expect violence: there's plenty of .38 special, but a surprising amount of .22 & .32, plus maybe a few odd calibers in between. The time period is the 50s-60s, and I know there's been some caliber inflation over the decades of what people think is necessary. But I would think that .38 special at the low end, and more often .357 mag & 45 ACP would be the go-to calibers among the violent crowd. Any thoughts on the reality of what was normal for that time period?
Another thing that bugs me is the prevalence of guys using a gun to bonk somebody on the head. From my knowledge, nobody who knows guns as working tools would go around doing that. I recall Elmer Keith describing bent barrels, broken grip frames, and other damage incurred from that kind of thing. Not to mention risk of negligent discharge.