NBA playoffs

Doc Holliday said:
wolfsong said:
Right. First it's rigged to increase revenue, and then it isn't. And of course the owners, coaches, players and refs are all in on the fix. Right. Such a simple thing to do. Funny how NO ONE has come forth with ANY evidence supporting such a conspiracy. Not one player, referee, coach, ball boy, no one. The shadow league must pay awfully well to maintain such blanket silence. Give me a break.

It IS a simple thing to do. If you can't see 'pro sports' is a business, out to make the most money possible, you're blind.

It's a long jump of assumption to go from, "Pro Sports is a business out to make the most money possible" to "they rig games". The reality is the are alot of legitimate ways pro sports can ensure they make the most money possible that doesn't involve game rigging. However the fact that you took that incredible leap without considering any other alternatives and with no actual evidence is quite funny.
 
Doc Holliday said:
Say it ain't so, Joe...

I'm sorry, are you referencing something that happened 100 years ago as evidence to rigging games today?
I surely hope not. Especially when you're point is the league is rigging games and that was a handful of players getting paid to throw a series in a gambling operation, separate from the league. I mean, that is the point you were woefully trying to make, correct?
How about some real evidence to the discussion at hand....
 
Doc Holliday said:
That's just one that got caught. Proof that it happens.

100 years ago
And nothing since.
And not relevant to what we are talking about (i.e. game-fixing vs league manipulation)
But hey, keep it going.
 
Meanwhile, game 3 is tomorrow night in Cleveland. The haters can go on hating, the conspiracy theorists can continue to watch the shadows and the bushes, and us fans will enjoy the games. We all find our satisfaction in our own ways.

Go Warriors.
 
Doc Holliday said:
ChiefMuzz said:
Doc Holliday said:
That's just one that got caught. Proof that it happens.

100 years ago
And nothing since.

...that you know of...doesn't mean it's not still going on.

And then we get back to that whole evidence thing. I asked for evidence, you can't produce any. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.
 
ChiefMuzz said:
And then we get back to that whole evidence thing. I asked for evidence, you can't produce any. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.

And you can't prove it's NOT happening. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.
 
Doc Holliday said:
ChiefMuzz said:
And then we get back to that whole evidence thing. I asked for evidence, you can't produce any. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.

And you can't prove it's NOT happening. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.

Lol. Yes I can. There have been no incidents of wide scale cheating in the NBA in the past century. There is your proof.
Care to provide any evidence to the contrary?
 
ChiefMuzz said:
Lol. Yes I can. There have been no incidents of wide scale cheating in the NBA in the past century. There is your proof.
Care to provide any evidence to the contrary?

Well, there you have it folks, the expert has spoken. We'll all take your good Christian word on it, then.
 
Doc Holliday said:
ChiefMuzz said:
Lol. Yes I can. There have been no incidents of wide scale cheating in the NBA in the past century. There is your proof.
Care to provide any evidence to the contrary?

Well, there you have it folks, the expert has spoken. We'll all take your good Christian word on it, then.

Still waiting on that evidence to prove what you are saying. I provided mine. :)
 
ChiefMuzz said:
Doc Holliday said:
ChiefMuzz said:
Lol. Yes I can. There have been no incidents of wide scale cheating in the NBA in the past century. There is your proof.
Care to provide any evidence to the contrary?

Well, there you have it folks, the expert has spoken. We'll all take your good Christian word on it, then.

Still waiting on that evidence to prove what you are saying. I provided mine. :)

You've provided nothing, except cheap entertainment for me, getting you to jump.
 
Doc Holliday said:
ChiefMuzz said:
And then we get back to that whole evidence thing. I asked for evidence, you can't produce any. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.

And you can't prove it's NOT happening. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.
Come on, Doc, you made the claim originally, yet you have not supported your contention with any verifiable, or even vague, evidence. You believe what you believe; so be it. That doesn't make it so, by any stretch.

Be that as it may, we all get it - you don't like pro sports. Duly noted. Do you have anything else of merit to share on the OP? Besides the little personal jabs, such as your "Christian" comment? Totally unnecessary and rude, by any standards of civil discourse. How becoming of you. SMH.
 
wolfsong said:
Doc Holliday said:
ChiefMuzz said:
And then we get back to that whole evidence thing. I asked for evidence, you can't produce any. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.

And you can't prove it's NOT happening. That's pretty clear at this point. Thanks.
Come on, Doc, you made the claim originally, yet you have not supported your contention with any verifiable, or even vague, evidence. You believe what you believe; so be it. That doesn't make it so, by any stretch.

Be that as it may, we all get it - you don't like pro sports. Duly noted. Do you have anything else of merit to share on the OP? Besides the little personal jabs, such as your "Christian" comment. Totally unnecessary and rude, by any standards of civil discourse. How becoming of you. SMH.

Likewise, ChiefMuzz believes there has NOT been any cheating or fixing (Pete Rose) in pro sports, without any support or verification. That doesn't make it so, by any stretch, either.
 
Doc Holliday said:
Likewise, ChiefMuzz believes there has NOT been any cheating or fixing (Pete Rose) in pro sports, without any support or verification. That doesn't make it so, by any stretch, either.
Do a little research and you will find that Pete Rose was found to have bet on games while a player and coach. That is a "no-no!" He never was even charged with 'fixing or cheating'.
 
Fox Mike said:
Doc Holliday said:
Likewise, ChiefMuzz believes there has NOT been any cheating or fixing (Pete Rose) in pro sports, without any support or verification. That doesn't make it so, by any stretch, either.
Do a little research and you will find that Pete Rose was found to have bet on games while a player and coach. That is a "no-no!" He never was even charged with 'fixing or cheating'.

It's no use. He's convinced the leagues are rigging the games to get more profit, despite the fact that with near 400 years of combined professional sports history to look at there is no evidence or actual proof a league has ever done that.
 
Fox Mike said:
Doc Holliday said:
Likewise, ChiefMuzz believes there has NOT been any cheating or fixing (Pete Rose) in pro sports, without any support or verification. That doesn't make it so, by any stretch, either.
Do a little research and you will find that Pete Rose was found to have bet on games while a player and coach. That is a "no-no!" He never was even charged with 'fixing or cheating'.
From what I recall he always bet his own team to win. He never bet otherwise so I never had a problem with Pete, ever.

Pierow
 
wolfsong said:
Now, that was a game. Doesn't look good for LeBron and Co. Warriors up 3 - 0.
You are telling me. The Warriors are so deep it's amazing Lebron won two titles against them. That move he made passing the ball to himself off the backboard and dunking it was just crazy.

Hey Doc,
 
ChiefMuzz said:
Fox Mike said:
Doc Holliday said:
Likewise, ChiefMuzz believes there has NOT been any cheating or fixing (Pete Rose) in pro sports, without any support or verification. That doesn't make it so, by any stretch, either.
Do a little research and you will find that Pete Rose was found to have bet on games while a player and coach. That is a "no-no!" He never was even charged with 'fixing or cheating'.

It's no use. He's convinced the leagues are rigging the games to get more profit, despite the fact that with near 400 years of combined professional sports history to look at there is no evidence or actual proof a league has ever done that.
If we want to look at possible professional sport "fixing" then the WWA would be where it just might have happened
 
ChiefMuzz said:
It's no use. He's convinced the leagues are rigging the games to get more profit, despite the fact that with near 400 years of combined professional sports history to look at there is no evidence or actual proof a league has ever done that.

It's called an 'opinion'. It's America, I'm allowed to have one. Deal with it.
 
wolfsong said:
Pierow, LaBron and Co. are 1-2 against Golden State. Looks like 1-3 very soon...
Yes, thanks for the correction. Just one title against the Warriors and the other two Spurs and Thunder.

The neat thing about being down 3 nothing is the possibility of an amazing comeback. We'll see what LeBrron and company has in store for game 4.

Not to derail this thread, I'm happy for Ovechkin. Nice to see him and theirs hoist the Stanley Cup.

Pierow
 
Back
Top