VA Shooter
Single-Sixer
Can some one tell me how I can find out how many GP 100 were made in 327 Fed Mag ?
I expect it is highly vocal interest among a very small number of enthusiasts. There is a reason Ruger (and everyone else) doesn't make guns for the .327 anymore and it isn't due to strong sales.Kevin said:You sure never see them in the used gun case.
There seems to be quite an interest in the 327. Which is nice.
diyj98 said:A ways back I watched a friend carry one around a gunshow and couldn't give the darn thing away. I told him it would be collectible one day, but he wouldn't listen to me. Of course I didn't offer to buy it from him at the time either.
32 H&R Long??? Never heard of that one!lovemydals said:Just about every .32 caliber cartridge that I know of can be fired in them (.32 Auto, .32 S&W, .32 S&W Long, .32 H&R Long, .32 H&R Mag to name a few).
Green Frog said:I feel like although the 327 Fed Mag was produced at the worst possible time (high interest in "black guns," industry problems with production vs demand of already-popular models, etc) it was a caliber that had tremendous potential for high performance as well as casual plinking far beyond what was commonly described in the gun press. It took me a while to get going, but I bought the Blackhawk as soon as I found out (by "back door" means) that it was available, meanwhile commencing a custom build of a K-frame S&W. I thought then and continue to think now after experience, that this is a fine round that if readily available or reloaded by the shooter, could be a world-beater of a revolver round. It was not pushed strongly by the industry via advertisement nor by actual production, so understandably not many but the most extreme enthusiasts even got to try it before the rather limited supply was gone and the industry bigwigs "determined" that the market was insufficient and essentially pulled the plug on the 327 before it really had a chance to get started. For everyone else who missed it, I'm sorry... for myself, I'm glad I was smart (or lucky) enough to get mine, and I plan to enjoy them for a long time to come. In spite of the contentions of the naysayers, I truly believe there is little that can be done with a 357 Magnum that can't be done about as well with a lot less powder and lead with the 327. I realize this may seem like heresy, but the numbers would suggest I am correct. That's my story and I'm sticking to it!
Froggie
Bad timing... Marlin discontinued the 1894 in 32 H&R Magnum just about the same time as Ruger introduced the 327. I wonder if the 327 could have saved that rifle model?Sunset_Va said:I wonder if a long gun had been made in the 327, would it have helped continue the 327.
Sunset_Va said:Most posting here like and have the 327, but I remember when the caliber was introduced, that it was dismissed by many, many people, as just a fad, already an underdog to the 357.
Knowledgeable folks bought the 327 chambered guns, but were outnumbered by the naysayers.
Personally, I like the 327 Federal more than 357 Magnum.
Yes! I have heard that in some revolvers the slightly rimmed 32 auto will fall into the chamber a little, so the firing pin can't reach it. All of my 32s shoot 32 auto just fine.Kevin said:I can shoot 32 auto in the 327? Is that correct?
Kevin said:I think I enjoy the 327 more than. 357 as well. The other day I saw some .32 S&W. They were terribly expensive. Close to 40 if I remember correctly. But reloading for the 327 is straight forward enough...
But. I can shoot 32 auto in the 327? Is that correct?
Discussion is one thing. Sales are quite another.Kevin said:Thanks. With the information talked about in this thread it is surprising the 327 was discontinued.
22/45 Fan said:Discussion is one thing. Sales are quite another.Kevin said:Thanks. With the information talked about in this thread it is surprising the 327 was discontinued.