grobin said:Is it worth it? I plan on reloading relatively small amounts of ammo in 10mm and 6.5 creedmore for target shooting and some 300 BLK and 9mm for plinking.
Yes, which Hornady Lock-N-Load press are you looking at? I can't imagine you would need more than a single-stage press for the reloading you describe.woodperson said:Are you talking about a single stage press with the Lock and Load system for changing the dies?
Twoboxer said:You don't have to grab the die or the die ring in order to remove a die/LNLbushing from a press.
This helps ensure you do not inadvertently loosen the die from the die ring when removing a die from a press. Since you don't have to tighten the die/die-ring to the press, it also ensures the die is tightened exactly as it was the last time.
Small differences, nice convenience.
Ironically, Hornady uses those die rings :)DGW1949 said:. . . On the other hand, if the die manufacturers wanted to do something meaningful for me, I'd sure like to see 'em go back to the old style of split lock ring instead of continuing to use the present solid ring and set-screw system...which, when ya get down to it, is actually the source of the "problem" they are now trying to tell me needs solved. :lol: :lol: :lol: .
Twoboxer said:Ironically, Hornady uses those die rings :)DGW1949 said:. . . On the other hand, if the die manufacturers wanted to do something meaningful for me, I'd sure like to see 'em go back to the old style of split lock ring instead of continuing to use the present solid ring and set-screw system...which, when ya get down to it, is actually the source of the "problem" they are now trying to tell me needs solved. :lol: :lol: :lol: .
But they don't really solve the problem like the bushings do. Hand tight on everything is good enough.
Rick Courtright said:Hi,
Years ago I worked in the insurance industry for a short while, and at least once a week we'd have a training session on "time management."
I can't say those sessions changed how I manage my time, but they did cause me to look at it thru different eyes. Those eyes bring out two particular issues with reloading. The one involved here is the time involved with swapping dies. We'll spend hours at the range, sometimes shooting only 20-50 rounds, and examining the results of each shot. No problem. We'll drive hours to go find a place to shoot, either out of necessity or curiosity. No problem. When we're done shooting, we'll go have lunch or breakfast with our shooting buddies and spend quite a bit of time talking about our newest gun, scope, load, or trinket. Then we'll go home and spend untold time cleaning the guns we shot that day. Again, no problem. It's been a good day!
Hours and hours and hours have been involved here. Yet we fuss about a few seconds, a minute or two maybe, swapping dies as if that short time is critical in the grand scheme of things?
Methinks anyone with a sense of humor who looks in the mirror every morning must just bust out laughing now and then, as I often find myself doing! :lol:
Rick C
I too found Rick's explanation to be interesting... But, what if you look at the situation in a different way. Let's say reloading is a task that you allow approximately 2 or 3 hours a week for. It doesn't interfere with your other activities. So why not use your reloading time wisely, that is finding efficient ways to use that 2 to 3 hours. You wouldn't want to do everything the 'old fashion' way would you? Hence we have new equipment, progressive reloaders, tumblers and all the modern stuff we use. Quick change dies just make sense.DGW1949 said:I hear ya Rick...Or to put all of that into my own red neck vernacular, it's more a case of "a lot to do about nothing" than anything else. I mean really, I could have changed a whole set of threaded dies in less time it's taken me to write this one short response...so what the heck a "quick change die"? :lol: :lol: :lol: .Rick Courtright said:Hours and hours and hours have been involved here. Yet we fuss about a few seconds, a minute or two maybe, swapping dies as if that short time is critical in the grand scheme of things?...