XDm 9 or SR9

.44 fan":23oiy1sz said:
Have to say I would go with the SR9, mabey because I have one but also because it is made in the U.S.A. and the XD is made in Croatia.

Buy American.

Is that computer you are typing on made in America?
 
Nickanto":hp4xtrmo said:
.44 fan":hp4xtrmo said:
Have to say I would go with the SR9, mabey because I have one but also because it is made in the U.S.A. and the XD is made in Croatia.

Buy American.

Is that computer you are typing on made in America?

Nope, and neither is the motorcycle I ride. Unfortunately it can be hard to find a lot of things made in the U.S.A. anymore, that one can afford.

But I was only offering an opinion which I thought was what this was about.
 
.44 fan":gvrz0dh1 said:
Nickanto":gvrz0dh1 said:
.44 fan":gvrz0dh1 said:
Have to say I would go with the SR9, mabey because I have one but also because it is made in the U.S.A. and the XD is made in Croatia.

Buy American.

Is that computer you are typing on made in America?

Nope, and neither is the motorcycle I ride. Unfortunately it can be hard to find a lot of things made in the U.S.A. anymore, that one can afford.

But I was only offering an opinion which I thought was what this was about.

I understand your point. I'm just frustrated with Ruger right now. It's sad that for the most part, American quality doesn't compare to imported. IMO the XDM blows away the SR9 in quality. Just like Toyota blows away Ford in quality.
 
but you wouldn't compare a Toyota Avalon to a Ford focus sedan?

apples and oranges, just like the SR9 and the XDM.
 
Our last five cars have been Ford/Mercury models and our last three pickups are Ford also. Our motorcycles are Honda so I guess we go both ways.
 
for full-size semi-autos, I don't go plastic and I don't go striker-fired... but if you're intent on considering these two choices... when looking into the XD...beware, early editions had rust problems. A new finish material was later used to improve corrosion resistence, but many of the early models in agency inventories were problematic.

Also, as with any Ruger product, the aftermarket goodies are much more interesting and easily attained.
 
Easy... The XD all day long.

I'm a Ruger fan. I have a LCP and a P95. Not to mention a Glock 37, Steyr 40, Taurus handguns, Beretta's, Witness 45, and a couple of other 9mm's. My XD is the best shooting handgun I own. If I had to give them all up but one... I'd keep my XD.

I've held the SR9, but I have not shot one. It just doesn't make me want one to hold it. It does appear to be a fine weapon; but, it just isn't very sexy.

If I were in the market for a 9mm and wanted to buy one today. I'd order the Sig Sauer SP2022 from CDNN for $469.
 
full frame size...rather than barrel. there's full-frames out there with barrels sometimes under 4 inches.

As well, I should've been more clear about my bias against striker fired full-size... it's purely personal, but to me the full-size is purely tactical and all of the shooting/training I do with them is tactical. Thus, my tactical muscle-memory is tied to hammer-fired semi's. Had I started out training with striker fired, I would probably feel the opposite...but at this point, I'm 20yrs into that routine and too lazy to consider a shift
 
I too am trying to decide between the XD40 and SR9 pistols.

I love Rugers, I have 3 rifles, MK 22/45, and Redhawk but, I like the XD pistols too. The XD doesnt feel as good as the SR9 in the hand but, it is close. Not too mention the .40 cal is a better round to me than the 9mm.
Springfield also has a great Military/ LE deal so I can get the XD40, 3 mags (hi cap), belt holster, speed- loader, and mag holder for $30 more than the SR9 w/ 2 mags.

Decisions, Decisions..........
 
I love my SR9... But after a year of owning it, I feel like I need to "move" up to an XDm.
 
I own a SR9 and really like it; but have been looking at the XDm as well; handled one just this past weekend. But, what I really need is a true "pocket pistol".
 
Nickanto":3tdpisom said:
.44 fan":3tdpisom said:
Nickanto":3tdpisom said:
.44 fan":3tdpisom said:
Have to say I would go with the SR9, mabey because I have one but also because it is made in the U.S.A. and the XD is made in Croatia.

Buy American.

Is that computer you are typing on made in America?

Nope, and neither is the motorcycle I ride. Unfortunately it can be hard to find a lot of things made in the U.S.A. anymore, that one can afford.

But I was only offering an opinion which I thought was what this was about.

I understand your point. I'm just frustrated with Ruger right now. It's sad that for the most part, American quality doesn't compare to imported. IMO the XDM blows away the SR9 in quality. Just like Toyota blows away Ford in quality.

Better do a little more research. This story is from 2007 but since then Ford has only widened the gap.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19073071/

Back to the topic..I've got an SR9 and a Glock 23 but have recently been concidering a Walther PPS. Does anybody have any experience with these.
 
tookalisten":12wgc4gf said:
I own a SR9 and really like it; but have been looking at the XDm as well; handled one just this past weekend. But, what I really need is a true "pocket pistol".

I have no qualms about carrying a full size pistol under a T-shirt. :lol:

But then again, I don't really care if I'm printing.
 
Not much choice between an XD of any flavor and the SR9 .... a proven top notch brand and a product with no skeletons in it's closet, or a product that's been riddled with defects, a recall, still to this day (after 2+ years) unresolved peening problems, as well as an unkown upgrade to the entire trigger group that's not backwards compatible. That's a choice ??

Sorry guys, gotta call a spade a spade ....

REV
 
Anthony Williams":3d5239ba said:
Rev,

....and the same visual appeal as a claw hammer :lol:

Not exactly sure which gun you're referring to AW, but it doesn't matter, because, personally I think ALL the plastic combat pistols have the appeal you describe above ... and I MEAN ALL, Glocks, M&P's, XD's, Sigs, SR9;s, etc, etc. In my opinion, ALL of the plastic pistols are ugly. :D

REV
 
Maybe to you Rev, but if a gun shoots & handles well dang if it doesn't make it look prettier to me.
 
Mike J":2ffqmmc7 said:
Maybe to you Rev, but if a gun shoots & handles well dang if it doesn't make it look prettier to me.

Oh I agree with you on that ... they're just not really nice looking like a 1911 or a nice revolver is.

REV
 
Rev, Would you mind if I pm'ed to ask your opinion about a project I'm considering having done?
 
revhigh":3n5vsjyi said:
Mike J":3n5vsjyi said:
Maybe to you Rev, but if a gun shoots & handles well dang if it doesn't make it look prettier to me.

Oh I agree with you on that ... they're just not really nice looking like a 1911 or a nice revolver is.

REV

Guess you're either one or the other. I think 1911's and wheel guns look old :lol: Mind you, 1911's are nice looking... Just in an old fashioned way. :P
 
Mike J":sz2f6ku7 said:
Rev, Would you mind if I pm'ed to ask your opinion about a project I'm considering having done?

Sure Mike, be glad to help with anything I can !

REV
 
Rev, that first gun is not old fashioned... It's just OLD. :lol: Other than the corrosion they look the same :P
 
OK, OK, you win !! It's hard to argue .... it IS a 99 year old design :D

REV
 
revhigh":6vq5bliw said:
OK, OK, you win !! It's hard to argue .... it IS a 99 year old design :D

REV

It's a classic design. :wink: I would have one if I had the money to blow. But high cap CC handguns are my priority.
 
Conrad I understand your liking hi-cap Autos. I like them myself. However there are different tools for different purposes. I don't have anything to say about 1911's due to my lack of experience with them.
Wheel guns allow for a wider variance of loadings due to the fact that they do not depend on the recoil of the ammunition to cycle. you can load a .357 magnum with everything from .38 special, to snake shot to full house .357 magnum loads. You can use bullets that range from 115 grain hollowpoints for manstoppers to 200 grain hard cast bullets to stop wild animals. I tend to think auto's have an edge in the city-revolvers have an edge in the woods.
I guess I just like them all. The problem is there is so little time & money & so many different guns.
 
Mike J":3o8hcb2g said:
Conrad I understand your liking hi-cap Autos. I like them myself. However there are different tools for different purposes. I don't have anything to say about 1911's due to my lack of experience with them.
Wheel guns allow for a wider variance of loadings due to the fact that they do not depend on the recoil of the ammunition to cycle. you can load a .357 magnum with everything from .38 special, to snake shot to full house .357 magnum loads. You can use bullets that range from 115 grain hollowpoints for manstoppers to 200 grain hard cast bullets to stop wild animals. I tend to think auto's have an edge in the city-revolvers have an edge in the woods.
I guess I just like them all. The problem is there is so little time & money & so many different guns.


That. :lol:
 
ConradM":cqkmlth0 said:
I love my SR9... But after a year of owning it, I feel like I need to "move" up to an XDm.

Hey Conrad !

Are you dumping the SR9 to 'move up' to the XD, or are you buying the XD in addition to the SR9 ?

Have you ever handled/shot a CZ75 ?

REV
 
Back
Top