Special blackhawk?

Single Six

Bearcat
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
90
Looking at a 1986 7.5" 45lc Blackahwk. Anodized alum ejector housing, blued steel grip frame (not Bisley). Nice plum-ish finish, grip frame matches frame. Bisley clylinder, finish doesn't quite match, not as finely polished. Hammer, trigger sides polished, hammer top and clylinder gate are plum. Overall much nicer looking than my late model 357. Someone's project gun or a special model?

Thanks
 
I started to look for my .45 as that sounded a little like mine, except for the aluminum ejector rod housing and lack of a Super Blackhawk grip frame.

My "Super Blackhawk" .45 was once a Bisley, so has the Bisley cylinder.

Bob Wright

Aw, heck, I'll just go ahead and post a photo:

100_84581.jpg
 
Several years ago I sent a beater Super Blackhawk in for a "tallest front sight "installation and an "over-all" refinish. I did indeed remove "my lockwork" and installed "their upgraded" lockwork prior to shipping. I also removed the grips.

Upon return I reinstalled the "Old Model" parts. I'm very satisfied with the results. I did have to "remind them" about steel ejector housings more than once but eventually received the proper components.
357690092.jpg

JMHO,

flatgate
 
Wow! That's a nice looking Super! They must have not refinished the frame then? The barrel, ERH & Cyl all look like new, but the frame has the lovely Ruger shade of purple to it! :)

I have a FT that needs a visit to the shop... Do I read your post right that I should be concerned about not getting my steel ERH back?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Some of the NM steel grip frames have the last three digits of the serial number engraved on them under the right graip panel. You might check to see if yours matches or not.

Sounds like a neat project gun.
 
Well, I've had this one a while now and am thinking about some changes. I've discovered it has a belt Mountain base pin, too.

I've mostly been shooting hot stuff in it, as that's mainly what I got it for, some thump. I enjoy long-range handgun plinking and busting concrete with LBT 350gr LFN over Linebaugh data 296 loads, and some hard Penn 255 RNFPs over Linebaugh data Unique loads.

Linebaugh data: http://www.customsixguns.com/writings/dissolving_the_myth.htm

I decided to back it off a bit and try for some accuracy. I found some Taffin data and loaded the two loads noted for accuracy, 231 and Herco with the 255s.
Accuracy at 25y was dismal, all over the 8x11 paper. I shoot 1911s a lot, and also have a 357 BH, and average maybe 3" groups with them when I work at it, sub 2" when I'm "on".

I decided to slug the 45 and see what was up with the cyl throats, barrel constriction, etc. I discovered a ton of lead in the bore, mostly towards the chamber. Well, probably just several grains, I should have measured it on my powder scale. I got a 185gr jacketed SWC with a sharp base, bumped up the diameter a couple thousandths, and ran it through the bore a couple times to scrape out the lead. Worked pretty good, left quite a pile of lead in the cylinder window.

I measured the cyl throats and found them to be .455", so I bumped up some jacketed 230s to fit, loaded them backwards to ~850fps and cleaned the rest of the lead out...and shot a 2.5" and 2.25" group with them.

I measured the bore to be .450" at the constriction in the frame and .451" at the muzzle...and a rough bore it is. I have some LBT lapping compound on some .455" 350s loaded over 4 gr of Trail Boss now waiting to fire lap it, hopefully it will shoot well with a .454" or so after lapping, compromise between the loose throats and tight bore.

My other discontent with it is the .489-490" chambers...hot loads bulge brass pretty badly. I'm considering having another cylinder fitted, if anyone could recommend a smith for that on a tight budget, I'd appreciate it.

I noticed that I think the sights on the 4-5/8" 357 seem to lend themselves to accuracy more readily, as the front sight is closer to the rear notch and fills it more completely. So...I'm thinking about lopping a couple inches off the barrel, I'd like it to be a little handier as well. I have a 5" ejector rod and housing to install (Thanks, Hondo!) and am trying to decide between 5.5" or 5" and flush with the ejector housing.

I'm also thinking about heating and bending = lowering the hammer spur or going to a SBH hammer for a little easier reach, I have medium sized hands.

Any and all thoughts, comments, pictures, and input are welcome.

Thank You
 
  • Wow! That's a nice looking Super! They must have not refinished the frame then? The barrel, ERH & Cyl all look like new, but the frame has the lovely Ruger shade of purple to it!

    I have a FT that needs a visit to the shop... Do I read your post right that I should be concerned about not getting my steel ERH back?

    _________________
    Best regards, Pete

If your revolver had a steel ejector housing when originally assembled then Ruger will usually reinstall a refinished steel ejector housing when "restoring" an early revolver. As I mentioned, sometimes they need to be gently "prodded" in such a way that they realize that they do indeed need to reinstall a proper version of the steel ejector housing. Yes, I've had a few "three screws" refinished over the years and the work has been very well done in my humble opinion. Now, I've also heard of "not so" desirable refinish work so I guess one must be prepared to see "less than ideal" work.

JMHO,

flatgate
 

Latest posts

Back
Top