I assume you are talking about the the recoil plate in the forearm. There are many misconceptions concerning Ruger bedding in general and especially the RSM's. Many don't like Rugers because of the angled bedding screw and think that in itself is problematic. It isn't, it just isn't the same as a Remington which everybody knows how to bed. The recoil plate and cross bolt are in addition to, not a replacement for, Ruger's normal bedding on lighter rifles. If you replace the stock to eliminate the plate you still have the angled screw and the provision for the cross bolt which should be used on any hard kicker anyway. The only possible advantage would be losing the weight of the plate. That may or may not be a plus... You won't be making it any stronger. If you want to turn it into something it's not, I would make sure you can put it back to the original configuration. Otherwise you are just destroying the value and it would be easier to start with something more "conventional". If you treat it as you would any rifle with substantial recoil and make sure the recoil is being handled by the proper parts (i.e. not the tang for example) you won't have any problems. RSM's were Ruger's premier line of bolt rifles and were generally fitted pretty well.