Ruger 1911 commander is real!

JasonH

Bearcat
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
38
City & State/Province
southeast
Check out this thread over on the 1911 forum for some pics of the new Commander model SR1911. You may have to join the forum to view the pics.

http://forums.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=396095
 
My Regional Ruger Sales Mgr, confirmed to me early this morning that the Commander SR1911 is real and orderable this month. A member of the "other Ruger Forum" reported that he was picking up one of ten delivered to his LGS this week............ I do not have the SKU for the gun...........MIKE 8)
 
Ho Hum. Just a short barreled full size gun. If they had come out with a CCO I would be all over it, but this does nothing for me.
 
Seems logical as I was starting to see the 5 inch guns in more and gunstores in cases with all the other 1911s in the upper $600 range.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I just sent my LGS an email; will be interested to see what the response is.
 
It is harder than heck to get the full size gun around here. Bet we have had no more than 15-25 in our shop since Ruger announced it. Currently have not had one in a couple of weeks. Don't forsee this one being any more available! But, I hope so. I put off buying the full size, as I already own a few full size 1911s, and I have my Kimber Ultra carry for an Officers size, but don't currently own a Commander. I reckon I will buy one when we get one!
 
Being the doubting Thomas that I am, called Ruger Customer Service this morning and was advised yes, SR1911CDM's (commander model) are in stock and being shipped to the wholesalers now. Then called my dealer to place my name on his want list. I am number 1 for a Ruger Commander. Life can be good sometimes. :)
 
WIL TERRY said:
IF IT IS NOT a lightweight commander style pistol why bother ??

For those of us who shoot carry guns a lot, the steel frame makes much more sense. It's more durable than aluminum. The added weight aids in recoil control as well.
 
The Ruger Commander is like a mountain. Why not climb it if it is there? Or in otherwords, why is there vanilla and chocolate ice cream....peoples choice? I just wanted one! :)
 
justbill2013 said:
WIL TERRY said:
IF IT IS NOT a lightweight commander style pistol why bother ??

For those of us who shoot carry guns a lot, the steel frame makes much more sense.

Why? It's only 3/4 of an inch shorter than a full size government, and if you're worried about the recoil of a 45, you probably should be shooting a full size 9.

As I said above ... if you can carry a steel commander .... you can just as easily carry a 5 inch one.

On the other hand ......... if you just want one for the sake of having it .... that's cool.

REV
 
As I said above ... if you can carry a steel commander .... you can just as easily carry a 5 inch one.

Exactly! It is much harder to hide the handle than the barrel, if they would have taken a half-inch off the butt along with that shorter barrel I would be in line to get one. But, this is just a waste of effort IMO.
 
Looks like we have differing opinions. I do believe it's easier/more comfortable/more concealable to carry a Commander. Trust me, I've carried both to know. :wink:

As for recoil, I don't recall saying anything about "being worried." One of my ideas of fun is shooting hot handloads in my .45 Colt Blackhawk. But I will take any advantage I get in a rapid fire gun fight.
 
s4s4u said:
As I said above ... if you can carry a steel commander .... you can just as easily carry a 5 inch one.

Exactly! It is much harder to hide the handle than the barrel, if they would have taken a half-inch off the butt along with that shorter barrel I would be in line to get one. But, this is just a waste of effort IMO.


I was thinking the same thing. Has anybody made a 1911 with short grip and full size barrel? Ed
 
Ruger is calling this 7+1 and the fullsize as 8+1. However, the frames appear to be the same. Is is just a magazine difference?
 
oscar said:
Ruger is calling this 7+1 and the fullsize as 8+1. However, the frames appear to be the same. Is is just a magazine difference?

Methinks they are trying to fool us into thinking it is smaller ;-)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top