- Joined
- May 17, 2014
- Messages
- 31
I prefer full size.Thinking of getting a 1911. Havent had one for 25 years. Ive owned all 3 sizes. Since I wont carry I dont need the Officers. Whats your vote, Commander or Full size?
I prefer full size.Thinking of getting a 1911. Havent had one for 25 years. Ive owned all 3 sizes. Since I wont carry I dont need the Officers. Whats your vote, Commander or Full size?
Only difference in the two is 3/4" of barrel/slide length, and sometimes the hammer and/or the spur on the grip safety...the grip dimensions are identical.The obvious vote would be for the one the fits in your hand better!
I have a Gold Cup, SA V-10, and a CZ Bob Tail Commander. All .45 ACP. Love 'em all but the Bob Tail the best. It's the most accurate and fastest. Only the V-10 has had a failure to feed. I carry the CZ in a Milt Sparks IWB or a Galco shoulder rig. The CZ also somehow feels lighter when carrying than my Kahr P45, which is my second fave carry gun.Thinking of getting a 1911. Havent had one for 25 years. Ive owned all 3 sizes. Since I wont carry I dont need the Officers. Whats your vote, Commander or Full size?
I get your feelings, but for me and my arthritic hands the 9mm cartridge was a blessing for me in 1911 pistols. Less recoil and lower weight recoil spring made racking the slide much easier.5" Government model in SS chambered in .45 Auto.
I have held several of these in my hand and despite what others might say I find them quite small and light weight. I couldn't fathom shrinking one down any smaller.
And of course getting one chambered in a Nazi cartridge is not only blasphemous but unpatriotic to boot!
That what I have the 45 Colt for.I get your feelings, but for me and my arthritic hands the 9mm cartridge was a blessing for me in 1911 pistols. Less recoil and lower weight recoil spring made racking the slide much easier.