JackBull
Hunter
5 rounds of 38 Spl or 10 rounds of 380? No other alternatives.
And number of each caliber.No contest. I'd take the .38-Spl over a .380 any day....Only question is, why is this in the 'semi-auto' section and not the 'ammo' section?....it is about caliber differences, eh?
DGW
I saw the "number of each caliber" referenced in the OP but I dismissed it as not being relevant to the actual question.....unless of course, one misses his target a lot, then maybe.... I can also see where someone may choose to believe that having the potential to put more hits on an attacker somehow makes up for not using a more powerful cartridge to begin with. The fact of the matter though, is that the .38Spl is capable of striking a much more serious blow than a .380, and that is actually the question at hand as I understand it....Oh and BTW, good luck to anyone on putting multiple hits on an aggressor. Most people would be very lucky to dig their little .380 out of their pocket in time to get one hit, and that's assuming the bad guy is dumb enough to stand still during the party...which in itself, is nothing that I've seen happen in real life.....Point is, I don't subscribe to the Walter Mitty school of thoughts that seem to be so prevalent these days, but I do believe in bringing enough gun.And number of each caliber.
I read the post as a More powerful few rounds vs less powerful many rounds polling question. I would rather have my Max9 than a CP 33 in a bad situation.I saw the "number of each caliber" referenced in the OP but I dismissed it as not being relevant to the actual question.....unless of course, one misses his target a lot, then maybe.... I can also see where someone may choose to believe that having the potential to put more hits on an attacker somehow makes up for not using a more powerful cartridge to begin with. The fact of the matter though, is that the .38Spl is capable of striking a much more serious blow than a .380, and that is actually the question at hand as I understand it....Oh and BTW, good luck to anyone on putting multiple hits on an aggressor. Most people would be very lucky to dig their little .380 out of their pocket in time to get one hit, and that's assuming the bad guy is dumb enough to stand still during the party...which in itself, is nothing that I've seen happen in real life.....Point is, I don't subscribe to the Walter Mitty school of thoughts that seem to be so prevalent these days, but I do believe in bringing enough gun.
DGW
I get what you're saying. There's other guns that I'd rather be armed with too. I was just trying to stick to the question, that's all.I read the post as a More powerful few rounds vs less powerful many rounds polling question. I would rather have my Max9 than a CP 33 in a bad situation.
20+ years ago when qualifying for my concealed weapons permit I was using a revolver and had two failures to fire with it... bad ammo...38. Why? because its a revolver and semis may possibly fail.
.38. Why? because its a revolver and semis may possibly fail.
20+ years ago when qualifying for my concealed weapons permit I was using a revolver and had two failures to fire with it... bad ammo..
Advancements in ammo technology has come a long way. For ALL calibers. It all comes down to what you can shoot the best.Do some realistic tests of terminal performance of .380 vs .38SP and then decide.
The .380 is a wimp on both ends. Better than a sharp stick but universally unimpressive.![]()
Advancements in ammo technology has come a long way. For ALL calibers. It all comes down to what you can shoot the best.
If you can put a round into your attacker's eye, then a .22 rimfire would even work.