GP 480

nmsu

Bearcat
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
37
The wait was long, but Hamilton does such great work...


35686223510_2d47961534_z.jpg
 
Hunter it starts as an Alaskan and a donor Redhawk barrel. And the wait was a few years. Something happened with the person doing his large caliber boring so that dragged things out, but well worth the wait. And it really balances out nicely with the 4" barrel. I just don't understand why Ruger doesn't make this revolver as a production item.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Wow that is something!

What is the felt recoil like with a .480.....in between a hot .45 Colt and a .454 Casull?
 
My first thought was it was a Redhawk. Nice gun! Let us know how it shoots. Man oh man, if it became a production gun, I would consider buying one and go work in Alaska for another year!
gramps
 
Mus408 said:
Wow that is something!

What is the felt recoil like with a .480.....in between a hot .45 Colt and a .454 Casull?
I shoot .44 mag DA. At Contender's, I shot his SRH DA clearing the table of steel plates. The .480 handled well. 8) I think a 240 gr LSWC with 22 gr of 2400 under it has more recoil in my Redhawk, than what I shot from the SRH. Of course that could be that Contender's reloads for .480 aren't full power? :shock: I think the cast bullet he had was 405 gr if I remember correctly, I don't know what powder or how much. I had a permanent smile after shooting the .480!
gramps
 
nmsu said:
Hunter it starts as an Alaskan and a donor Redhawk barrel. And the wait was a few years. Something happened with the person doing his large caliber boring so that dragged things out, but well worth the wait. And it really balances out nicely with the 4" barrel. I just don't understand why Ruger doesn't make this revolver as a production item.

Good plan. Actually I think the Alaskan has a better grip than the Redhawk. How did they get the barrel off and the othrer added?
 
That's exactly the gun I had in mind for Hamilton to make me. Beautiful, highly useful sidearm!
 
NICE gun! Bowen does excellent work.

" At Contender's, I shot his SRH DA clearing the table of steel plates. The .480 handled well. 8) I think a 240 gr LSWC with 22 gr of 2400 under it has more recoil in my Redhawk, than what I shot from the SRH. Of course that could be that Contender's reloads for .480 aren't full power? :shock: I think the cast bullet he had was 405 gr if I remember correctly, I don't know what powder or how much. I had a permanent smile after shooting the .480!"

That cast slug is moving along at about 1050 fps,, so it's a mid range load. And yes,,, it's a sweetheart to shoot.
 
That is sweeet. Memo to Ruger, dump the frame extension on the SRH's. Not everybody wants scope mounts on their revolvers and the SRH handle is soo much more user friendly than the Red's.
 
That is soooooo nice! You are very lucky, don't think Bowen will make any more for a while - if - ever! If I spent that much $$ it would be for one of those conversions. Please more pics! I can at least dream & drool :D :)
 
Ah, you have realized my dream gun. It really is nice. Wish Ruger would update their Redhawk to the SRH innards and grip peg. They could also standardize on fewer parts and assembly. I am with the others as don't need the frame extension on the Supers.
 
s4s4u said:
That is sweeet. Memo to Ruger, dump the frame extension on the SRH's. Not everybody wants scope mounts on their revolvers and the SRH handle is soo much more user friendly than the Red's.
Bite yore tongue! "Both" is always the right answer. ;)

IMG_7716b.jpg
 
CraigC said:
s4s4u said:
That is sweeet. Memo to Ruger, dump the frame extension on the SRH's. Not everybody wants scope mounts on their revolvers and the SRH handle is soo much more user friendly than the Red's.
Bite yore tongue! "Both" is always the right answer. ;)

IMG_7716b.jpg

I don't mind BOTH. They wouldn't have to quit the Supers entirely ;-)
 
Really nice. I had a SRH shortened to 4.75" and recoil was not bad. I was shooting 410 grain cast bullets at 1100 fps.

I sold it only because I found almost the same thing in 44 and that was what I originally wanted.

I also wish Ruger would make a SRH like yours with a 3 or 4" barrel.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top