CANTED BARREL REVISITED ... Again ... And yet Again

Carry_Up

Single-Sixer
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Messages
383
City & State/Province
Dallas, TX
It does not surprise me that the subject of canted barrels has come up - AGAIN. I suggest that the most recent OP on this subject to do a simple search or two to reveal the hundreds of posts on this topic. You will find what you want to know and more. Try the other forum as well - also saturated with information on the same topic.

No, what surprises me is that the usual suspects are present to chime in with their fantasy claims of high quality factory service that will take care of this problem, or any others. You will find that dozens of customers who have sent their NEW SP101's and GP100's in for canted barrels (and other problems) have NOT received professional and timely service at all. If you want to send in your new firearm and have it disappear into the Bermuda triangle for months, then factory service is for you.

My theory is that all these happy upbeat comments come directly from the factory itself. It is, they say, the occasional screw-up that is an unavoidable by-product of mass production. 2 comments: first the unavoidable screw-up can be detected and fixed before leaving the factory. Or, the production process can be tweaked to prevent the problem from happening. Neither of these things has been done. How do the other major revolver manufacturers manage to screw on their barrels straight? Or more importantly, how do the revolvers in question constantly get produced incorrectly?

The problem with canted barrels has existed for some years and is not limited to the SP or GP lines. Take your pick of the numerous reasons why this problem has persisted for so long.

Let me point out why the buyer may not be aware of the problem before purchase. 1). Barrels are just shy of square by only a few degrees; it is not immediately obvious even to trained observers. They are ALL screwed on incompletely, never too far. 2). Those of us who value proper gun handling are not in the habit of cocking the firearm in the gun store, bringing it to eye level and carefully pointing it at some light colored surface to detect a problem. 3). We are definitely NOT in the habit (and rightly so) of staring down the barrel of ANY firearm, especially if other people are present. Usually the canted barrel problem is easiest to detect in just this manner - i.e. looking down the barrel from the muzzle end - unfortunately.

Finally I will say that after speaking with a number of gunsmiths who have tried to screw the barrel in just a little to fix this very problem, have bent the frame or stripped the barrel threads. The barrels are crush fit and apparently are also permanently fixed with lock-tite. I think the only way to go on this problem - assuming the dealer will not take it back - is to install a modified front sight. As far as the occasional and inevitable mass production mistake, that is a joke. I personally own 2 SP101's and 2 GP100's, purchased over the course of several years. All 4 of them have canted barrels. Why would I send them to the same people who couldn't manage to do it right the first time?

Just another personal opinion.
-CU
 
+1

It's a joke.

After buying 2 brand new Rugers that ended up having serious issues out of the box (even more serious than canted barrels), I can no longer stomach those who actually defend Ruger's quality control issues by saying "Well, Ruger has the best customer service in the business and they'll make it right for you".

Gee, thanks Ruger. How nice of you to fix your mistakes.

I love Rugers, but these problems are really starting to pick away at me. My last 3 handguns have been Colts. My next one will be the NIB Python that my dealer has marked for $2,000. It's about 4 times as much as a new GP100 will cost me, but I've finally decided that the extra attention to detail is worth the price that it demands.

I'll still buy used Rugers that have been tested out by someone else. But I will no longer buy brand new ones that I don't get a chance to shoot first.
 
I had my Single-Six back in a week when I sent it in. That is, after the front sight bothered me for four years. It actually showed up at my door the same day I got the card that said they received it for service if I remember right. This was just this past summer.

I've had two 50th Anniversary Blackhawks, and one of them had an over-tightened barrel. It was just barely noticeable, but I could see it.

I sent my Smith and Wesson 17 (30 years old and not under warranty) back this past summer too, and it cost me $87 and almost four months to have the over-tightened barrel/crooked front sight corrected. Ruger did the same job on my Single Six for free in a week and paid return shipping. That might be the difference that other people are talking about when they compliment Ruger's service. I can only speak for my one instance of dealing with their service, though.

My 1989 GP100, 1980's Old Army, and 2007 SP101 that I used to own all have straight sights.
 
I guess my rather large SA & DA Ruger collection must be defective. I have only had ONE slightly off canted bbl. I chose to fix this myself, as the gun is quite a tight shooter.
BTW; I'm not from the factory, nor do the folks who defend them here work from them. It's actually RARE for a factory employee to post here. I know, I have spoken with many of them in PERSON. Yes, some of them look in here to visit, & some do not. I'm also sure that the folks (like me,) who do not seem to have problems would LOVE to work for Ruger.
The service dept is there to help correct an obvious factory problem. But the mass produced firearms do not carry a custom price. So, the tolerances are a bit looser than,, say,,, Freedom Arms. If it's NOT a factory mistake, or is within normal factory specs, then, they will not "correct" a percieved problem.

I have had Rugers presented to me by their owners who CLAIM to have a canted bbl. Upon looking them over, I could not see it. Yet, after I've observed their "inspection" methods, I see the problem. It's their eyes, or method of judging a problem.
I see it, and yet when it's pointed out to that person, they deny it.
So, just like the OP;
JMO!!!!!
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I have bought three new Blackhawks in the last seven months with canted barrels verified by measuring, not just my eyes. I don't care that they cost a pittance compared to some of my customs. They don't hit where I am aiming no matter how hard I try, even in a rest. Ruger has a problem, and they seemingly don't give a damn about fixing it. I passed this on to the VP of sales at SHOT, I could see it going in one ear and out the other.
 
Maybe that's why my repair slip said "repaired barrel" when I sent my new Bisley convertible in for missing screws? I did not mention any barrel problem and did not fire it prior.
 
I returned a Single Six with a canted sight about 5 years ago...it came back to me in 3 weeks from when I sent it. I normally wouldn't have taken it home but this was one that I odered and it was to be a gift fro my wife. I was treated fairly by Ruger and have no complaints.

I have a bunch of Rugers both old and new but that has been the only issue over many thousands of rounds...Check it before you leave the shop and it isn't a problem, if not and you see it later realize there is some shared responsibility for lack of attention to detail on the buyers end also. In dealing with Ruger 3 times on phone conversations I was treated very fairly and would return for more.

and NO I don't work for them either :roll:
 
COR said:
Check it before you leave the shop and it isn't a problem, if not and you see it later realize there is some shared responsibility for lack of attention to detail on the buyers end also. In dealing with Ruger 3 times on phone conversations I was treated very fairly and would return for more.

and NO I don't work for them either :roll:
I am an FFL and sell guns, what then can they use as the excuse when I get them in the mail?
 
I'm personally involved with a canted barrel at this point in time. I'll not go into detail here as I have on both forums in the last few days. I will add this. Not everyone working at Ruger is a schmuck. The young lady I spoke with on the phone regarding my S.B.H. was absolutly the best. She was polite,understanding and supportive. The thing that really rubbed me the wrong way was the reply I got back from service after they decided to blow off my problem. I've worked in the tool/die/machining industry for 32 years now. I'm not permitted to, nor do I have the luxury of looking the other way regarding sloppy craftsmanship. I fully understand how the whole sight alignment problem can exist. Barrels are likely turned and threaded as one opperation. The frame another. So far so good. The only way to have a barrel come up at 12:00 is to regulate the relationship between the shoulder of the barrel and the desired torque spec of the thread. In a custom environment it's done by hand through trial and error. Likely the way it was done at Ruger 30 years ago. You can't just bring it on up to 12:00 with a vise and wrench,nor can you back one off to center that is too far the other way. I understand production tollerances. The afore mentioned parts are now CNC machined in huge quantities. They are given a +/- tollerance in decimal degrees and if they fall into the spec they are shipped. Not a problem for me,until I end up with one. The whole system allows for a percentage of them not being noticed,or returned when they are. It also allows for the ones that are returned for repair. Mine is currently back for the second trip. If I had bought it used as a donor for a conversion I'd be typing another post somewhere. But, for $600.00 new, they are going to fix this or become very tired of me. I had a go around with High Country Archery years ago. Been a long time since I had a "project" . In closing I'll say again that not all Ruger employees are deceitful and self serving. I apologize for any gross generalizations I've made in the past regarding Ruger. The root of the problem lies with the powers that be,not the employees.
 
Festus; You have an excellent insight as to how the manufacturing of the guns are done. You know it can be properly fixed and I'm sure it will be done. About the only thing you didn't mention was the tool wear that occurs as each part is being built. That too can cause very minor out of tolerance parts. And when a worker is tasked with production, quite often a product gets by w/o a very close inspection.

I just wish a lot of the "negative" folks who complain about ANY gun that is mass produced (not just Ruger,) could have to work a few months in a plant & have to produce the guns according to a schedule, and only be paid for all the ones they build & pass their inspections. A lot fewer guns would come out at first, and they wouldn't get paid much.
I had the pleasure of visiting El Dorado Arms often back in the day, and they hand fitted each gun. TIME CONSUMING. I have also had the pleasure of visiting Freedom Arms, and it reminded me of El Dorado on steroids. Just a bigger place with a careful hand assembly of guns. TIME CONSUMING. So, when a worker is given the prospect of careful, slow almost perfect guns, and their paycheck reflects that slow production, all while their co-worker is turning out guns at a much faster rate, that aren't quite the same quality, and making more money due to increased production, I'd bet good money that many of the negative folks would speed up their production, allowing an occasional "oops" to get by.
You have to realize, Ruger, S&W, Colt, Remington, etc all have to produce a product in enough quantity to make MONEY. Companies like FA, are much smaller because they won't produce guns on a mass production scale. But the price of the FA's is MUCH higher than a Ruger.
Many folks want perfect at dirt cheap.

Now, I'm not saying that there isn't an occasional royal screwed-up gun that gets by QC, but by & large, ALL mass produced items are made well enough to do the job they were intended. The percentages of problems are low compared to production numbers.
So, if you have an issue, a POLITE call to Ruger (or S&W etc) will usually get you a lot of great service.

JMO!
 
Well put contender. You my friend have been around the handgun block a time or two. I would love to take a tour or two myself. I have to agree that tool wear is a bit of a problem for sure. Our CNC production parts are spot inspected @ regular intervals to limit "falling through the cracks" Just good business. Our customers will reject parts at our expense. I guess we agreed to those terms ,so we better make it happen. Good QC will take care of the tooling wear.
My mentor in centerfire benchrest rifles/competition,has given me a huge respect for how firearms should be made. He has built himself quite a reputation as a precision rifle smith. You know we are our own worst enemies. We want more models. More options. With more chamberings. To satisfy our obsession with single action or revolvers period,that we have shot ourselves in the foot. Pun intended. We are putting a bunch of demands on Ruger,and the other major manufacturers. When you get a good one it's fantastic. When you get a "monday morning" Ruger it's hard to remember all that we ask of them. Now,if they are ready and able to take all the money we are offering in good faith,they should tighten it up on their end as well. This single action boom has been raging long enough now that they should be picking up the pace a bit. Without a bunch of re-work. We have shown a willingness to buy all they can make, time to adapt and overcome. Lets put the quality back in American made.
 
Wow, lots of good information from both festus and contender.

I've only sent one gun back and that was a Smith and Wesson. I tried a local gunsmith who only made the problem worse and cost me more. It took about 3 months to get it back and was about 300 dollars. I have both a gp and sp and the fit and finish is very nice. I only have three other Ruger revolvers, not many compared to some of you but they too are all correct.
 
I don't expect perfection, I expect guns to be able to at least HIT the target I am aiming at, at 25 yards. I can live with the grips that don't fit right and the front sights that look like a freaking retard soldered them on, I can live with an inch or creep on one trigger and none on the next or 1/2" of overtravel on day but not the next, but if the gun wont shoot, it's a doorstop. Excuse it all you want, I have had barrels turned both ways so it's not a tooling issue. I have owned and sold 50 or so DA's and SA's and had no issues until I started buying Bisley Blackhawks. Junk, every one.
 
Festus, Yes, we can be our own worst enemy. If you hang around guns a while, you start to get more & more picky about what you like. Accuracy finally comes into play. Many new handgun shooters have no clue as to how to shoot one properly. So, whatever they get they are happy with. Then, as they learn more, then they realize they would like "more" from their guns. Striving for perfection begins with a desire for better accuracy. But, they fail to understand the physics of manufacturing a mass produced item, for a marketable price. Hence, the custom gun makers, or the small personal shops get more business. As humans we realize we all have limitations.
As I learned about guns & shooting over the years, I found myself at a crossroads so to speak. I wanted precision accuracy, at a production price. (Sound familiar?) I wasn't able to spend big bucks on a custom gun, but wanted to shoot very accurately. I also got bit by the handgun hunting bug a bit. I started with a Redhawk in 44 mag. I was EXTREMELY lucky in that my first one, with a medium reload shot sub MOA. I still have a target in my files of a 6 shot group at 50 yds that is .990 in total outside dimension. I hunted with it for two of the three weeks of our deer season, vowing to drop nothing less than a wall hanger for it's first kill. The last week was with a 243 rifle for meat. Well, it finally happened. A very nice buch came out, and I missed. Why?? Well, I had become so used to such good accuracy that I often shot it with the scope, and without. I never had any zeroing issues taking the scope off & on. It so happens that I began deer season without checking the zero. But, I had not gotten the scope on correctly & I missed. I was so mad at myself, I put the Redhawk up, switched to my T/C Contender, and started slaying deer. The lesson I learned was to: Remove all possible human errors by fitting the gun to me, shooting it properly, and reloads that matched the gun. That way, the mechancial errors in a mass manufactured handgun would be minimized, and yet magnified by the rush of hunting. By accepting the limitations of a mass produced firearm, yet working to make that gun perform the best, became my method of things.
Like many of us, I've had an occasional firearm that just wouldn't shoot for me no matter what I did. But a few minor cosmetical issues weren't nearly as big a problem as how the gun shot. My Contender in 7x30 Waters shoots sub MOA. It's a production barrel & all. I've just worked to make it as good as it can be. Same thing with all my shooters.
Now, if chris_ is having an issue with ALL of the Bisley guns, my first thought is that he's not familiar with a proper gripping method for the Bisley. Just my thoughts according to his post. I have some Bisleys, and they shoot just fine. (And, I was a nay-sayer about Bisleys until I shot one.)
 
I have a problem with Bisley BH's. I can shoot my Bowen BH and Bis Vaqueros just fine. The barrels are canted.
 
I must be the luckiest person alive. I own around 20 ruger single actions and all my barrels are straight all shoot fine and I have never had to move my sights from centered in the slot over 1 or 2 clicks either direction most have been fine as shipped from the factory now the elevation I do have to adjust to fit my loads. Most of my blackhawks have been bought in the last 3 years and all were brand new in the box when I got them with no problem. I have been satisfyed with all my guns and never had a ruger to need sending back in for any type of repair. I'm sure a bad apple can be found occasionally. But have you ever noticed people don't often praise a product when they get a great one but let one bad one get out and everybody want's to jump on the wagon. I've always said if you don't make a mistake you must not do anything.
 
its not a question of "jumping on any bandwagon, good OR bad" it is something that one should"expect" to be right, when its brand new......yes, I carefully look at ANY gun I'm about to buy or someone brings to me to 'inspect' and I can count on ONE hand how many times I've "personally"had to send ANY gun back to any of the big manufacturers,,but many other folks buy them, get them out , shoot 'em and NOW start to "see, find and have" a problem or issue,,,,its not only Ruger but others , we see S&W with more than their fair share also, but as noted above, they are "mass producers" of a product, made by humans , for other humans........and yes $#it happens, inevitable....MY problem is "why" is there always time enough to fix, repair, recall, redo any of these, and not to make it "right" in the first place, ??? there should be accountability in their "process, test firing, and QC ( final inspection BEFORE shipping.......) yes I worked on repair and building lines at some of the gun factories back in the 70's training for our shop to be a service provider and doing warranty repair work...so I got to SEE and DO, the building and the setting up, final fitting as well as test firing.........its NOT that time consuming, nor hard to do and if shot, the tester either hits the target or does NOT?? they "see" the sight alignment, and the QC "sees', feels, and looks at the outside appearance and notes any findings from the test firing....SSSSOOOOOOO, this tells me that NOT all the guns are test fired to any "extent,OTHER than the 'test fire spent cartridge" that is federally required or at least by some of our 50 United States.........bent ( canted) is bent or canted, it will throw the round other than to the point of aim...........this should be picked up,noted, sent back or whatever , NOT shipped out for the customer or the receiving gun shop to have to remedy....just think how many folks buy any given gun, and just put it away, never shoot it, and we'll never know if theirs is "good or bad"....nothing wrong with the squeaky hinge getting the oil, and yes we hear that all more too often than the "great job" my gun is "perfect"...............
as a consumer, you MUST pay more attention, and look at what you are spending your hard earned cash for these days, no matter WHAT the product.
Hopefull it is covered and stood by and behind the maker, who is in a big hurry, to get "it" out..............
 
Call me crazy, but if I had such a negative experience with a given product all the time, I would not buy their products nor hang out on one of their forums. :?
 
RiverRat said:
Call me crazy, but if I had such a negative experience with a given product all the time, I would not buy their products nor hang out on one of their forums. :?

Ok, RiverRat....You're crazy :wink:

The comlaints that are being voiced here deal mainly with new production Rugers. I have already stated that I'm no longer going to purchase NEW Rugers over the internet (or anywhere else) if I don't get the opportunity to thoroughly inspect them first. But that doesn't mean that I should never buy ANY Ruger revolver ever again, nor does it mean that I should never be allowed to "hang out" on a forum dedicated to Ruger guns. A major part of this forum is members sharing experiences, both good and bad. There's no denying that Ruger's QC issues have became much more prevelant in recent years. Some of us are worried that Ruger is headed in the wrong direction.

I also buy pre-war Winchesters. Back in 1965, Winchester started heading in the wrong direction, and look where they are now. I'll NEVER buy one of the new Japanese Winchesters, but that doesn't mean that I can't still collect and/or talk about the old models that I love.
 
Ruger sends me a check for $150 every time I post something nice about the company.
 
OK......I guess you are right........the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people... :lol:
 
rdf009 said:
RiverRat said:
Call me crazy, but if I had such a negative experience with a given product all the time, I would not buy their products nor hang out on one of their forums. :?

Ok, RiverRat....You're crazy :wink:

The comlaints that are being voiced here deal mainly with new production Rugers. I have already stated that I'm no longer going to purchase NEW Rugers over the internet (or anywhere else) if I don't get the opportunity to thoroughly inspect them first. But that doesn't mean that I should never buy ANY Ruger revolver ever again, nor does it mean that I should never be allowed to "hang out" on a forum dedicated to Ruger guns. A major part of this forum is members sharing experiences, both good and bad. There's no denying that Ruger's QC issues have became much more prevelant in recent years. Some of us are worried that Ruger is headed in the wrong direction.

I also buy pre-war Winchesters. Back in 1965, Winchester started heading in the wrong direction, and look where they are now. I'll NEVER buy one of the new Japanese Winchesters, but that doesn't mean that I can't still collect and/or talk about the old models that I love.

Let me "educate" you a little. It's obvious from your posts that you are not an EXPERIENCED collector. For if you were then you would know that even pre '64 Winchesters & even Colt Pythons had flaws now & again. It's just the nature of manufacturing. I've seen civilian 1st Gen. Colt SAA's that had badly fitted hands and were rough as a cob inside. Does anyone do their job 100% perfect every day? Who bats 1000 in MLB? Any NFL QB always throw completions? Life is full of mistakes. Get used to it or join a monastery.

Call Ruger & get the gun fixed. They WILL fix the gun. And quit whining.
 
Boge said:
Let me "educate" you a little. It's obvious from your posts that you are not an EXPERIENCED collector. For if you were then you would know that even pre '64 Winchesters & even Colt Pythons had flaws now & again. It's just the nature of manufacturing. I've seen civilian 1st Gen. Colt SAA's that had badly fitted hands and were rough as a cob inside. Does anyone do their job 100% perfect every day? Who bats 1000 in MLB? Any NFL QB always throw completions? Life is full of mistakes. Get used to it or join a monastery.

Call Ruger & get the gun fixed. They WILL fix the gun. And quit whining.

Thanks for putting words in my mouth for me, but I don't remember saying that pre-64 Winchesters and Colt Pythons were absolutely flawless. However, If you seek to compare Pre-64 Winchesters and Colt Pythons to Current production Rugers, then you are either insane or in need of a little "education" yourself. And unless you are about the same age as my grandfather, I seriously doubt that you saw too many 1st generation Colt SAAs leave the factory.

But, once again, thanks for putting words in my mouth. They didn't make sense (especially when you started comparing guns to sports games), but maybe that's how "experienced" gun collectors get their point across these days.
 
Thanks for the comments, gents. At least it gets people thinking. It is all too easy to equate any modern product with sloppy, quick, incorrect, and highly disappointing results...all in the name of making a buck. Unfortunately it is true in too many cases. That is surely the story you get from "upstairs". Typically, those upstairs people have no idea, and don't care what is actually being produced.

We are told that modern CNC machinery can hold tolerances of half thousandth. I haven't seen any evidence of this statement. Even if the tooling is not perfect, the measuring equipment does not "wear out", and should compensate for other problems. But that is beside the point. Nothing in my book says that everything has to be the cheapest. I might apply that thinking especially to firearms. Now that I have 4 revolvers that need to be replaced or fixed, the real price of the item has just gone up by hundreds of dollars, not to mention the time and trouble it will take to ship them, and wait - repeating the cycle over and over. All the while I don't have the use of my firearm. Another reason I will not avail myself of factory assistance is the untold hours I have spent fixing all the other problems that come gratis with the new product. I will not have my work removed and replaced with crudely made production parts. That's not a policy I can live with.

So, would I be happy to pay the extra money to have it done right the first time? You bet I would. But, according to gunsmith friends that have tried it, getting the barrel off the frame to set the barrel back results in ruining the frame AND the barrel. That's why factory service cannot service the problem; they can only replace the whole gun. That's not likely. And, it is really too bad nobody is listening at the factory.

CU
 
Carry_Up said:
Thanks for the comments, gents. At least it gets people thinking. It is all too easy to equate any modern product with sloppy, quick, incorrect, and highly disappointing results...all in the name of making a buck. Unfortunately it is true in too many cases. That is surely the story you get from "upstairs". Typically, those upstairs people have no idea, and don't care what is actually being produced.

We are told that modern CNC machinery can hold tolerances of half thousandth. I haven't seen any evidence of this statement. Even if the tooling is not perfect, the measuring equipment does not "wear out", and should compensate for other problems. But that is beside the point. Nothing in my book says that everything has to be the cheapest. I might apply that thinking especially to firearms. Now that I have 4 revolvers that need to be replaced or fixed, the real price of the item has just gone up by hundreds of dollars, not to mention the time and trouble it will take to ship them, and wait - repeating the cycle over and over. All the while I don't have the use of my firearm. Another reason I will not avail myself of factory assistance is the untold hours I have spent fixing all the other problems that come gratis with the new product. I will not have my work removed and replaced with crudely made production parts. That's not a policy I can live with.

So, would I be happy to pay the extra money to have it done right the first time? You bet I would. But, according to gunsmith friends that have tried it, getting the barrel off the frame to set the barrel back results in ruining the frame AND the barrel. That's why factory service cannot service the problem; they can only replace the whole gun. That's not likely. And, it is really too bad nobody is listening at the factory.

CU
In the case of my three BH's, all three received a new barrel and were sent back to me.
 
rdf009 said:
...Thanks for putting words in my mouth for me, but I don't remember saying that pre-64 Winchesters and Colt Pythons were absolutely flawless...

Yes you did, or why else the inference? :roll:
 
Back
Top