Jayhawkhuntclub
Buckeye
Any good for a gun oil?
I keep one thing in mind when cleaning and lubricating my hunting guns - smell. Anything with a strong chemical odor will alert game of my presence way too early.
Not a problem that I've experienced.CanonLyles":2bmbl3zr said:The only 2 problems I could see coming from using ATF on guns are removing blue finish and staining polymer/synthethic frames and stocks. I'm doubting, especially since nobody mentioned it, that it takes the blue off. But, what about poly frames?
CraigC":3o0kjzcf said:Tests have shown that Mobile 1 provides very, very minimal protection against corrosion.
I can afford them too, which would explain how I happened to be able to try a bunch of different ones. Heck, I can't figure out one particular gun I want to shoot all the time, why should I be able to pick out a favorite lube? FWIW, I like Tetra Grease, too.WESHOOT2":3a8fn2ll said:I've been pretty impressed with BreakFree CLP at -20F, or 92F.
I've been pretty impressed with Tetragun Grease under those conditions, too.
I can afford them :roll:
CraigC":3a8fn2ll said:No. Why? Gun oil is cheap and plentiful and it was formulated for guns. With anything else there are far too many unknowns. I don't particularly want the red dyed ATF anywhere near any of my "white" grips, of which there are many.
Tests have shown that Mobile 1 provides very, very minimal protection against corrosion.
Yes, they are. I expect my gun oil to do both. If all I need is lube, grease is probably a better solution.Yosemite Sam":1zvj5o3i said:Lubrication and corrosion protection are two vastly different things.
True, you can interpret how you wish. The salt spray tests that I've seen show that Mobile 1 is a poor protectant against corrosion compared to CLP. Motor oil is also way too thick for most firearms-related purposes.Yosemite Sam":1zvj5o3i said:[*]As cas pointed out, there is a lot of conflicting "test" data out there.
It is cheap. Dirt cheap. Cheaper than dirt. When a 4oz bottle of Breakfree and a couple small cans of RemOil last me for several years, protecting a collection of five or six dozen guns, it IS dirt cheap. I can't even express how completely insigificant $8 is in maintaining $50,000 worth of guns. Squalling about the cost of gun oil and using something intended for another purpose because it saves you a few dollars over the course of several years is about like buying a brand new, fully engraved $4000 single action and toting it in an Uncle Mike's nylon holster.Yosemite Sam":1zvj5o3i said:[*]$8 for 4oz of product isn't cheap. Admittedly, it ain't gonna break me, but it's the principle.
Why use it if it's "just as good" but NOT better???Yosemite Sam":1zvj5o3i said:I can certainly understand not wanting to use ATF because of the potential for staining, or the smell, but from my reading it is as good a lubricant as anything out there.
Is it better or is it just as good? Who says it's "better"? What tests have been conducted? No matter how many times this discussion comes up, there has never been any factual data put up that supports anything being "better". While there has been plenty to suggest that motor oil is NOT better. If you really engage your brain, you'd realize that motor oil and gun oil are two completely different purposes. One is designed to operate at hundreds of degrees in an enclosed environment, under pressure and has lots of added detergents that WE HAVE NO IDEA how will effect a firearm's materials, finishes and the shooter.Yosemite Sam":1zvj5o3i said:...using individual, purpose-specific products produces better results.