That is a NICE revolver!I've been wanting one of these for a while. Found one in excellent condition with the complete package.
View attachment 59089
View attachment 59090
View attachment 59092
That is a NICE revolver!I've been wanting one of these for a while. Found one in excellent condition with the complete package.
View attachment 59089
View attachment 59090
View attachment 59092
I learned to reload in mid '70's from an old friend. An OM BH .41 was the first handgun I owned. Grew to appreciate it for accuracy and take down. I lost my reload info from then, so I don't know what I loaded, both lead and jhp. We cast our own lead. Still love the .41, wish more people would learn to appreciate it.Yes, been reloading since the 1960s. The 41 mag is one of those rounds that is inherently accurate. Most everything shoots good and some shoot lights out. That load is close to what Bill Jordan and Elmer Keith mused about for LE. They thought the best balance in a police load would be around a 200 grain bullet at around 1100 give or take. That load is a 210 cast bullet that averages 1079 fps. It is very comfortable shooting and it is very accurate when I do my part.
That's not a terrible situation to be in!I gave up on ever getting one, had to settle for a S&W 657. OH, woe is me.......
Your right, I shouldn't complain, but what the heck. I WANTED A REDHAWK!!!!! There, rant over. I can now enjoy the rest of the day,That's not a terrible situation to be in!![]()
Thats pretty funny. I gave up for now too. 4" S&W 57 should be here any day. Its pre-lock, but still relatively newer production (2005?). It's magnaported and I've never had one of those, should be interesting. I really wanted a standard 4" 657 or 4" Mountain 657, but the prices can be a bit much.I gave up on ever getting one, had to settle for a S&W 657. OH, woe is me.......
Funny, but several years ago I'd gotten the .41 Mag itch pretty badly. I dearly wanted a model 57 but they never showed up locally in gun shops and always were sky-high at gun shows.I gave up on ever getting one, had to settle for a S&W 657. OH, woe is me.......
Are those hogue grips ? Look great on thereFound my 5.5" about 6 years ago at a LGS. It is now my main whitetail rig and just tagged another one with it a few weeks ago.
Delightful gun to shoot and a tack driver.
View attachment 62077
You're right, it is a 6" according to my spreadsheet. The model 29 was first offered in 6.5" before later changing it to 6". My mid-length 29 is 6.5".Rob, you might want to double check the barrel on that 57.
Smith standardized the 57 production at 4, 6, and 8 3/8".
They are indeed! Thank you.Are those hogue grips ? Look great on there
They only built approximately 20,000 of the model 58, IIRC, and an older gentleman told me that only 1,800 of those were the S-series serial number. A year ago I ran across this early (Jan. 1966) S-series and it was my great fortune to snag it for a very respectable price. It's like a mega-model 10!And yes I remember when you couldn't give away a M58.
Now folks realize they were much lower production numbers than the 57.
If only I'd known...
no, shipping sleeve only. It is a wonder Ruger didn't have a KRH-415 stamp on the sleeve as well.Yes it is. I guess it's the box it came in. There is no SN on the box. Did they write SN on the double action boxes during this time?
Thanks for the information Chad.no, shipping sleeve only. It is a wonder Ruger didn't have a KRH-415 stamp on the sleeve as well.
Chet15