My experience with flat rate is at my old local dealer in North Dakota.They charge $90 hour for labor supposedly and a one hour minimum. So you go in for say something simple like a cabin air filter. On my car you just open the glove box unclip 2 clips and pull It out. 5 minutes if you've done it before. If I buy a new one it's under $10 at Walmart Mart. If I have it done at dealer it's $25 for the filter and $90 labor.
That's not flat rate, that's merely inflated pricing. Flat rate would be for them to look up the time for the filter and charge that time multiplied by the labor rate. But most places don't for things like filters. Instead they make a menu price based on their average cost across all the different models. Set it up to make a small profit on average with the worst case being a small loss on 3% of the jobs and the best case making more than normal margin on the easiest 3%. This is what good shops do.
Or like you said GG maybe they allow 3 hours for an alternator swap. A good mech can do it in an hour. So the faster the mech works the more he makes. Lots of incentive to cheat to get paid more.
So you're saying whomever does the best job should not get paid the most. How did we get from most efficient to cheater? Where was that line crossed?
I want to hire the mechanics at the actual rate it takes to finish the job way cheaper as book time allows way too much. I've dropped off my vehicle at 10:00 picked it up at noon and paid for 3 1/2 to 4 hours labor before. Assuming it took 15 minutes to drive it in and out and for the tech to find the work order and grab the parts, why should I pay so much labor? There are local guys with small shops charging by the hour, I think that's where I will go next time.
Please explain how "book time allows too much". There are jobs that pay too much, yes ... and there are even more that pay too little. For a good technician, they average out once the customer pay hours are added.
How is it determined? GM uses time studies although most every time is transliterated from a previous similar operation. They test people's time doing repairs with only hand tools (yeah, right) then take the average
then make the time about 60% of that for warranty rates. Most aftermarket labor time guides take warranty times and increase them by 30%. So where'd the rest go we are owed?
Translation: I want my cake and to it too. You want the most knowledgeable, efficient, and competent technician that has the cost of the beginner. I guess that's what everyone wants but it doesn't work that way. It's not flat rate you are against, it's that the price is too high. Well, so is everything else including the cost of operating a shop. You have no problem paying by the hour if someone takes 5X longer than it should? What incentive to be efficient does an hourly technician have? He's making the same no matter what pace he works and the slower he is, the more YOU pay. Makes perfect sense.