Star43
Buckeye
The 32 mag one sure sounds interesting. ..They have another one that looks just like this one ,but in 32 mag.
![Thumbs up :thumbsup: 👍](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f44d.png)
The 32 mag one sure sounds interesting. ..They have another one that looks just like this one ,but in 32 mag.
I would cost a lot to feed it.The 32 mag one sure sounds interesting. ..![]()
So true, with factory ammo for sure !!I
I would cost a lot to feed it.
But there sure is something special about the 32 H&R Mag to a Lot of people.....Me included!!I
I would cost a lot to feed it.
My crib of 32HRM'sOhhh, but you really dooo. There is something magical about a Single Six 32 H&R Mag !!![]()
That is a beautiful collection you have there. That yellow boxed SSM is just beautiful. I would not shoot it either. You don't see a marked SSM every day......in fact never over here in CA. The 327 in the middle with the standard grips (they are pretty grips on that one) is also a beauty!!My crib of 32HRM's
The SSM marked guns NIB w/ Shippers, that I can't bring myself to shoot,,, and I'm really not a collector.
![]()
And there 327M's cousins.
![]()
Along with an another weak moment in time….
![]()
Nahhh I'm good,,,REALLY!!!
Yes you want to play with your guns and shoot them for sure......but today, not with an SSM!! Keep that thing pristine and it will look better and better with every year !!NICE revolvers! They're no good if you can't shoot them and play with them!
I would cost a lot to feed it.""The 32 mag one sure sounds interesting. ..![]()
I think Uncle Howie is probably correct that maybe there was a mistake on the adjustable sight thing. It would make no sense to go thru the trouble to get rid of the adjustable sights when Ruger makes so many fixed sight guns. It's just unnecessary work and needless, IMO. I mean it looks good now, but it would be nice to get down to the bottom of what the gun was originally. The guy who owned that gun or the one who did the work on it, would be the ones to clear this up.![]()
Wow, that is a LOT of work to do what he/they did. So, you think Ruger was correct on it being originally an adjustable sight gun ? I guess a picture does tell a thousand words looking at a factory top strap...I mean it turned out great, but why start with an adjustable sight gun, with all of the fixed types around ? They must have wanted to a accept a challenge or maybe it was the only gun he had to do it with....but with the cost to do that and the effort involved, wow.....but it turned out ok, so God Bless America !!!Take a look at the top strap near the hammer. You can see that it is different than the Factory fixed sight factory guns.
That was a great deal when you consider all of the mods that were done.
Factory gun
View attachment 46621
Two 3 Screw Blackhawks that Alan Harton did.
View attachment 46622
And he did it well. Maybe it will come out who this Custom Gunsmith is ?? He could be doing a lot more things. Who knows ?? Yes, he did it.Yes Ruger was correct and he did it because he could.![]()
After thinking of what was done with the effort and the great results on the 22.......Gee, it makes that 32 H&R look even More interesting now.The 32 mag one sure sounds interesting. ..![]()
Yeah, I see the bevel on the cylinder. A liitle thing that one doesn't really notice when looking at a photo...but it shows that custom work was done.After looking at the pictures again it's possible that Alan Harton could have done the work. Notice also that the cylinder has a black powder bevel on it which is the way Alan does one. Alan has a lot of experience doing this type of conversion since he did 17 3 screw Blackhawks for Joe Bowman.
View attachment 46637
Notice the cylinders and top straps
View attachment 46638