Kevin said:
Re: plastic spoon:
I agree. Another thing I can't stand is paper plates. Some relatives of mine use them as everyday plates. They don't want to bother wasting time to wash dishes. I tell them my daughter can't thank them enough for polluting the earth for her future.
Blume, that's very strange about the city not taking glass for recycle.
How many of us use products in our unique lives which require packaging?
Breakfast cereal? Eggs? Pasta box or bag? Paper targets? Box of ammo? Shipping boxes from Amazon or equivalent for that item we want, but possibly don't need?
While we're on the subject, do we really need to use gasoline to drive to the gun store and then to the range? How about driving to our child's soccer game or school performance or that weekend afternoon driving in the country? Or to the movie theatre or the store for shopping? Do you really need a new pair of socks or pants? How about that computer on which you're reading this? Aren't you aware of the toxins which are by-products of the production of your phone and tablet and computer?
How many of these activities are "necessary?"
And doesn't each of us find a way to justify our actions?
And how qualified are we to judge the actions of another as being "necessary" or "wasteful?"
Dick Cheney was excoriated for saying the following: "Conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy," he said.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2001-05-01-cheney-usat.htm
Is the goal to cause civilization to make do with less?
Or to find methods which allow more people around the world to have access to more advancements and modern amenities for better lives and health and futures?
I guarantee that I can look at anyone's life here and find "waste."
And you at mine.
But that doesn't really advance our society or civilization.
More for more people, not less for more people.
Monty
ETA: Rancher Will stated it much more succinctly, as usual.