As I have said repeatedly via email, now a PM on this site, as well as text, your preferred communication until now, I want to only deal in writing so there are no additional confusions on what is being said. You have just now, after I sent you a link to this conversation, started to acknowledge anything from me at all and left me two VM this AM.
Stating what is being said here is slander is not really the direction needed. You can claim to be out of town, you can claim to not have known the hole was there, I don't really care. (Though regardless if you did the work or John G did the work, if you ever cleaned the gun you would know there was a hole.) You sold a bad gun, stand behind it and pay for it to be corrected, or buy it back. I'm not asking anything out of line and you can make the choice yourself.
Thanks
Stating what is being said here is slander is not really the direction needed. You can claim to be out of town, you can claim to not have known the hole was there, I don't really care. (Though regardless if you did the work or John G did the work, if you ever cleaned the gun you would know there was a hole.) You sold a bad gun, stand behind it and pay for it to be corrected, or buy it back. I'm not asking anything out of line and you can make the choice yourself.
Thanks