What I have learned is when police are dispatched to investigate a crime or possible crime, if the caller is there to meet you. They all have their stories or theories of how the bad guy did this or that. Many times the person who they found dead was shot, the animal they found dead was poached. When in fact is was a drug OD or a vehicle hit the deer. With animals the person might be able to stand around a look at your investigation. Often after a few minutes it ends like this. Police: The animal was struck by a vehicle on the road and died here on your property. Citizen: Well how do you know all that. We hear shooting all the time and it was shot by the SOBs that live down the road. Police: Well you see the blood, skid marks on the road. The blood trail leads to the body and the wounds are not gun shot wounds.
It is normal for people to try and put the pieces together and form some type of bad guy did this event. They form opinions based on TV, movies' which are just plain wrong, not facts. Even when facts were under their feet. They just do not see them.
Mobuck's story, I found to be so true. Since I and my co workers dealt with that type of issue. What kind of pissed me off is after they hear the real story, using real evidence. Some would still argue their story.
But, how to you convince the kindly person reporting some poacher shot and killed a hawk on her property. And when she lead me to the scene of the crime. It was a drake mallard duck struck by a vehicle near the road. In my case I carried the duck over to her and said. "Mam, look at it. It has a duck bill and webbed feet".