williamc
Single-Sixer
Buds gun shop has the 26" model available for $983 with free shipping. Wow.
CMH said:Got that in a email message form Ruger this morning. Have never shot a RL but always liked the looks of them. Steel shot safe?
clayflingythingy said:I have 3 RL's. All bought when I was just starting out shooting shotguns and knew doodly squat about shotguns.
Today I would prefer a Benelli auto 1st and Browning auto 2nd in my choice of shotguns for sporting clays. If I had to shoot an U/O it would be a Beretta. I would not advise the purchase of a RL.
YMMV
PaulChristenson said:clayflingythingy said:I have 3 RL's. All bought when I was just starting out shooting shotguns and knew doodly squat about shotguns.
Today I would prefer a Benelli auto 1st and Browning auto 2nd in my choice of shotguns for sporting clays. If I had to shoot an U/O it would be a Beretta. I would not advise the purchase of a RL.
YMMV
WHY?
golferboy426 said:If he doesn't I've got a bunch of NIB originals , all gauges
clayflingythingy said:PaulChristenson said:clayflingythingy said:I have 3 RL's. All bought when I was just starting out shooting shotguns and knew doodly squat about shotguns.
Today I would prefer a Benelli auto 1st and Browning auto 2nd in my choice of shotguns for sporting clays. If I had to shoot an U/O it would be a Beretta. I would not advise the purchase of a RL.
YMMV
WHY?
RL's are muzzle heavy pigs even with the barrel side spacers removed and thrown into the recycle bin. After spending a number of years on the sporting clays course I tried a number of different guns. A sporting shotgun should SWING. A RL does not. And over time I came to consider a good semi as better than an U/O for my shooting.
I suspect the reintro RL will still be a muzzle heavy pig.
Rick Courtright said:Hi,
This question's probably for Jeff Q:
The original RL developed a reputation on our target fields as being a bit "club like." I wouldn't go so far as that "muzzle heavy pig" comment, though, especially in the smaller gauges. They weren't "bad" so much as there was just something missing in the feel. Perhaps "not very lively" would describe it?
How does the new one handle in comparison?
Rick C