sr9 vs?

[reuben_j_cogburn]

The SR9 looks interesting to me.... I've never held one but did handled a S&W sigma that felt pretty good.....
Any real feedback here.. not just gun rag stuff.. what do you guy's think?
Would you sell a gun to purchase an SR9?

I've been reading the posts and i'm not sure what to make of it... It looks good but...... is the action so problematic?
It seems like it doesn't hold up to being taken apart and reassembled well... parts break by dryfiring?... doesn't sound like a Ruger..


reuben..

 

[ballcoach16]

I sold my S&W Sigma 9mm in order to buy my SR9c and I have been very pleased thus far. I really liked my sigma, but i wanted something with a lighter trigger and a little more concealable. The SR9c fit the bill in both respects. Took a little getting used to after the Smith, but so far worth it.

 

[clint_lnl]

I own an S&W sigma 40sw and a Ruger SR9, the SR9 to me is the best 9mm I have owned. I like them both BUT if the SR40 is as good as the SR9 , I would sell the sigma to get the SR40

 

[Yosemite Sam]

If I owned a Sigma I'd trade it for an SR-9, too.

I would not, on the other hand, trade one of my Sigs, my AR-24, Hi Power, PPS, an XD, or a Glock 9mm (if I still had one) for the SR-9. Heck, I'd probably already own a P345 if it weren't for the stupid mag safety, which is also an issue with the SR-9. It also sounds to me like the guns are terribly inconsistent, and that tells me they still haven't perfected production. And yes, when you can break it by dry firing, I think there's an issue. Sorry Ruger. OTOH, there were problems with the LCP too, and I have one of those which has been fine.

History and mag safeties aside, the SR-9 is a comfortable, ergonomic, slim gun that looks like it would be easy to pack, the SR-9c even more so.

If I had no 9mms and wanted a polymer gun the SR-9 would be on the list, even with the above caveats. Especially since someone posted that link to them for $300 or so.

I'd have to think long and hard about that mag safety, though. I don't like them, yet don't feel it's appropriate to remove them based on legal issues. I don't feel like trying to explain to a jury how I know more about handgun safety than the manufacturer that designed a gun a particular way. Yet another personal issue regarding CCW weapons... (I disabled the mag safety on my Hi Power by virtue of installing a C&S trigger, but it is not one of my carry guns, in any case.)

-- Sam

 

[Sonnytoo]

If I owned a Sigma I'd trade it for an SR-9, too.

I would not, on the other hand, trade one of my Sigs, my AR-24, Hi Power, PPS, an XD, or a Glock 9mm (if I still had one) for the SR-9. And yes, when you can break it by dry firing, I think there's an issue.
History and mag safeties aside, the SR-9 is a comfortable, ergonomic, slim gun that looks like it would be easy to pack, the SR-9c even more so.

I'd have to think long and hard about that mag safety, though. I don't like them, yet don't feel it's appropriate to remove them based on legal issues. I don't feel like trying to explain to a jury how I know more about handgun safety than the manufacturer that designed a gun a particular way. -- Sam

A very good post. Well thought out and explained in full, IMHO.
Sonnytoo

 

[Anonymous]

I own an S&W sigma 40sw and a Ruger SR9, the SR9 to me is the best 9mm I have owned. I like them both BUT if the SR40 is as good as the SR9 , I would sell the sigma to get the SR40

What is your prefix # on your sr9? Have you had any issues? I'm buying one next week, want to make sure I get the right updated version with no issues.
Thank you for you help. I am also interesdted in the sr40 but I haven't heard much about it.

 

[gak]

I usually hang out at the Revolver forum,. but I've got the same question, especially regarding the "C" variant. Held one today and it fit my disproportionately small paw great, which wasn't a bad surrogate for my galfriend I'm inquiring for (yes I know ultimately is is and should be *her* decision). What about felt recoil? Ergos? Other considerations, especially for a 9mm newb? (she has had several range/class sessions, but the instructor has changed 9s around so much, she's not sure she's developed a brand opinion). Don't mean to hijack--if so tell me and I'll start a separate thread--but I'm wondering the same OP question too--what about the SR9/SR9C? For approximately same price (+$100 max), should we be looking also at the M&P, etc?

 

[Cheesewhiz]

I usually hang out at the Revolver forum,. but I've got the same question, especially regarding the "C" variant. Held one today and it fit my disproportionately small paw great, which wasn't a bad surrogate for my galfriend I'm inquiring for (yes I know ultimately is is and should be *her* decision). What about felt recoil? Ergos? Other considerations, especially for a 9mm newb? (she has had several range/class sessions, but the instructor has changed 9s around so much, she's not sure she's developed a brand opinion). Don't mean to hijack--if so tell me and I'll start a separate thread--but I'm wondering the same OP question too--what about the SR9/SR9C? For approximately same price (+$100 max), should we be looking also at the M&P, etc?

I have owned my SR9 for almost three years and it is a good gun, never had a misfeed and only had two FTE because of short loads and not the gun. I have put more rounds thru it than many people will shoot in a lifetime. I have also shot a few SR9c's and I find them to be really nice guns also. If you buy a new SR9 make sure it has the new 'D' shaped mag release, the trigger is better on the newer models, the SR9c's all have the newer trigger.

The recoil on these guns is very light and the guns handle very well. I recommend the SR9 series of pistols and I have also found that women like them quite a bit after shooting them at a range.

Edit: the women were shooting my SR9, I wasn't shooting at the women. :lol:

 

[steveodtw]

My freind has a Sigma. Last year I shot his, he shot my SR9. He said my SR9 had much less recoil, more accurate, better ergonomics. I agreed. I had several stovepipes on his Sigma. SR9 was flawless. If I had it to do over again, I'd have the SR9C. Better carry gun all the way around.

Forget the Sigma-get the SR9 or SR9C. I have well over 1000 rounds through mine with no issues.

 

[clint_lnl]

I own an S&W sigma 40sw and a Ruger SR9, the SR9 to me is the best 9mm I have owned. I like them both BUT if the SR40 is as good as the SR9 , I would sell the sigma to get the SR40

What is your prefix # on your sr9? Have you had any issues? I'm buying one next week, want to make sure I get the right updated version with no issues.
Thank you for you help. I am also interesdted in the sr40 but I haven't heard much about it.

mine is 330-368XX and 400 rds not a missfire or jam all perfect
they had a recall on the SR9
Ruger will retrofit all affected SR9 pistols (those with serial number 330-29999 or lower)

 

[jhearne]

If your looking for the $400-450 range, the SR9 is a great option for striker fired guns. If you were open to a poly hammer fired pistol, the Sig SP2022 is a great option, I can buy one from Academy for $450.

If you go for an SR9 (which is IMO, miles ahead of the Sigma in nearly every aspect), look for a 331 prefix serial number with the "D" shaped magazine release. That model will be the most current product in terms of revisions and whatnot. Much more consistent trigger (from gun to gun) and generally lighter pull.

The Sigma I shot was very problematic, best I could manage was one shot before a jam/misfire. My SR9 (330 prefix) has seen no issues, over 2K rounds.

Josh

 

[greener]

The SR9 is a competent, accurate 9mm with pretty good ergonomics. Since it lower priced than the XD's, Glocks, M&P's, Sigs, etc, it is a good choice. I'd rather have one than a Sigma.

I've had one for about 18 months. Went through jhearne's tune-up and polishing and enjoy the pistol. Needs peppier rounds than my M&P9 to cycle and seems to like FMJ's better than lead bullets. The pistol is reasonably accurate up to 25 yards (fartherest I've shot it) and dependable. I have no qualms about it as a carry weapon.

But....

I also have an M&P, which I prefer to the SR9.

 

[FergusonTO35]

As the Ruger "end consumer R&D" comes to a close, the SR-9 seems on its way to being another stalwart Ruger product. S&W's new SD series pistols, which I'm pretty sure are an updated Sigma, are pretty sweet looking though. The later Sigmas are well liked by people who own them, their reputation never recovered from the travails of the earlier ones.

 

[reuben_j_cogburn]

I own ruger revolvers... and a Mk1, but i've never really warmed up to Rugers centerfire auto's until I saw the SR9...
But I just hate the thought of having to take time (and money) out to return it for problems.....
I live remote and having issues with, with anything is a bit more of a pain than usual....
Maybe I'll wait until spring..
I'll keep my eyes peeled here though.....

Thanks y'all...

reuben...

 

[Sonnytoo]

I own ruger revolvers... and a Mk1, but i've never really warmed up to Rugers centerfire auto's until I saw the SR9...
But I just hate the thought of having to take time (and money) out to return it for problems.....
I live remote and having issues with, with anything is a bit more of a pain than usual....
Maybe I'll wait until spring..
I'll keep my eyes peeled here though.....

Thanks y'all...

reuben...

I also have Ruger revolvers and a Target Mk 1 auto. I have a SR9c, which is my first and only Ruger semiauto. I have also had ten Glocks; still have five. Just bought two more in the fall.
If you like the size of the SR9c, try out a Glock 26 subcompact at the range. If you like the larger SR9 size, try out the Glock 19 or Glock 17. IMHO...
Sonnytoo

 

[Sonnytoo]

I own ruger revolvers... and a Mk1, but i've never really warmed up to Rugers centerfire auto's until I saw the SR9...
But I just hate the thought of having to take time (and money) out to return it for problems.....
I live remote and having issues with, with anything is a bit more of a pain than usual....
Maybe I'll wait until spring..
I'll keep my eyes peeled here though.....

Thanks y'all...

reuben...

I also have Ruger revolvers and a Target Mk 1 auto. I have a SR9c, which is my first and only Ruger semiauto. I have also had ten Glocks; still have five. Just bought two more in the fall.
If you like the size of the SR9c, try out a Glock 26 subcompact at the range. If you like the larger SR9 size, try out the Glock 19 or Glock 17. IMHO... It is highly unlikely you'll ever have to return one for problems. I haven't with ten Glocks over 20 years.
About 72% of all law enforcement in the U.S. carries a Glock. There must be a reason for this. And it's NOT all related to money.
Sonnytoo

 

[Anonymous]

Go with the Ruger. The Sigma has a horrible trigger with a pull weight of about 12 lbs. The SR9c is about 4 lbs and is far more accurate and reliable.

 

[Bob G]

I would encourage anyone to pick an SR9 up. Holding it should make even the most discriminating enthusiast a fan. Quite honestly it is one of, if not the most comfortable hand guns out there today. I haven't experienced any malfunctions of any kind. I think that the SR9 will be highly regarded for many years to come. Just for the record, I am a former Marine of the Mod. 1911 vintage. I never thought I would own a 9mm, but the SR9 won me over.

 

[LuckyGunner.com]

If I was in the market for a new 9mm handgun I would take a look at the SR9. I'm not completely convinced it's as good as the offerings from Glock, XD or sw M&P.

Compared to a Sigma I think the Ruger wins out without and issue. I haven't had a chance to handle or fire the new Sigma that has the M&P trigger.

Honestly price would be a motivating factor. I don't see a huge difference in most of the major manufacturers polymer handguns. In general the accuracy, dependability and size is close enough that you just want to find the one that fits your budget and preferences.

It wouldn't bother me a bit if the SR9 was my only 9mm handgun, but on the same token it wouldn't be my personal choice. If you are already a big fan of Ruger and are in the market for a poly gun the SR9 is a safe bet.

_________________
40 S&W Ammo

 

[revhigh]

I own an S&W sigma 40sw and a Ruger SR9, the SR9 to me is the best 9mm I have owned. I like them both BUT if the SR40 is as good as the SR9 , I would sell the sigma to get the SR40

Given those two, I'm not surprised the best gun you have is an SR9 !!

REV

 

[revhigh]

What about felt recoil?

It's a 9MM .... virtually no recoil at all.

REV

 

[revhigh]

If you go for an SR9 (which is IMO, miles ahead of the Sigma in nearly every aspect

Same as the Sig 2022, which is miles ahead of the SR9, for very near the same price.

REV

 

[revhigh]

If you like the size of the SR9c, try out a Glock 26 subcompact at the range.

Now THAT is good advice .... it's an accurate little bugger !

REV

 

[Cheesewhiz]

Rev, have you shot an SR9c or a newer model SR9 yet?

 

[revhigh]

Just the SR9 .... and I wasn't impressed in the least. I actually reviewed it a year or so ago. A guy at the range had one and I put about 150 rounds through it. It's way too thin for me .... doesn't feel right in my hands, and had one of the worst triggers I've ever felt. The owner sold it shortly afterward primarily because of the terrible trigger.

REV

 

[Cheesewhiz]

Just the SR9 .... and I wasn't impressed in the least. I actually reviewed it a year or so ago. A guy at the range had one and I put about 150 rounds through it. It's way too thin for me .... doesn't feel right in my hands, and had one of the worst triggers I've ever felt. The owner sold it shortly afterward primarily because of the terrible trigger.

REV

The newer ones have a pretty good trigger (last 4 to 6 months), the SR9c is a really nice little gun, it does shoot very well for a small 9mm. You should give one a try, you'll be surprised.

 

[revhigh]

Just the SR9 .... and I wasn't impressed in the least. I actually reviewed it a year or so ago. A guy at the range had one and I put about 150 rounds through it. It's way too thin for me .... doesn't feel right in my hands, and had one of the worst triggers I've ever felt. The owner sold it shortly afterward primarily because of the terrible trigger.

REV

The newer ones have a pretty good trigger (last 4 to 6 months), the SR9c is a really nice little gun, it does shoot very well for a small 9mm. You should give one a try, you'll be surprised.

I'd love to try one, but I'm sure not BUYING one !! LOL.

REV

 

[Cheesewhiz]

I just have the one plastico (SR9) but I'm tempted to get an SR9c at some point. I have quite a few Glockaholic friends so I really do get my fill of plastico when we go to the range.

...Someday I'll write something about how they dismiss me absolutely smoking them on the range with a CZ and still being able to not give me or the gun any credit at all. It sounds almost psychotic but it is truly funny logic.

 

[revhigh]

It's a rare Glock, or ANY gun for that matter, that can outshoot a good shooter with a CZ.

REV

 

[Sal1950]

Just the SR9 .... and I wasn't impressed in the least. I actually reviewed it a year or so ago. A guy at the range had one and I put about 150 rounds through it. It's way too thin for me .... doesn't feel right in my hands, and had one of the worst triggers I've ever felt. The owner sold it shortly afterward primarily because of the terrible trigger.
REV

That's one mans opinion and I'm sure it's perfectly valid in that individual guns case, but for sure not representative of the SR series production. You can find many other "reviews" that will give you an exact opposite impression. One of the most recent,

"The most important feature in a competition gun is the trigger – and after running the trigger for over 1400 rounds and several hundred dry-fire reps I can objectively say that it’s a fine trigger."
http://gunnuts.net/2010/11/24/the-truth-about-the-ruger-sr40/

REV, no disrespect but you owe the readers here at least another look at a couple representative examples of the current SR9 series before continually putting the weapon down and recommending they send their $ to Austria for a Block instead.
The Glock is no doubt a good weapon but it's not the last word in guns. There are many just as good at competitive prices and made in the good ole USA!
Sal