gig
Single-Sixer
I will tell ya that I have a 3/32 roll pin punch on order...................
markbrumbaugh said:While all the concerns and warnings are valid....these concerns darn near apply to having a CHL or even owning a weapon. We need to let us fellow freedom loving gun owners have the right to be freedom loving. That means however they want their lawfully owned private property used, deserves a fellow gun owner's respect. Just my opinion, but we need to respect our community and bloviate less about what others do or like. I've been especially disturbed lately by know-it-all "experts" on other forums talking down to less experienced folks. Opinions can be shared, hopefully without telling someone they are an idiot. (Whoops I may have just done it myself.)
ArmedinAZ said:Don't be skeerd, someone has to be first. :wink:
Nope, tearing down is not the problem, putting it back together is my anticipated hangup. :?Precision32 said:Can't even tear the firearm down but you're going to re-engineer it!!!
gig said:Nope, tearing down is not the problem, putting it back together is my anticipated hangup. :?Precision32 said:Can't even tear the firearm down but you're going to re-engineer it!!!
Good point, and since I value the SR-22 as a training tool for the larger caliber pistols, this is certainly something to consider.Jwp721 said:"One downside to removing the magazine safety is that the magazine will no longer be forcefully ejected from the gun when you push the mag release button. You may have to pull it out."
One of the coolest things about the SR is that when you push the mag release the magazine shoots out like it is on steroids. That is a feature I would not give up.