Security six ?

Let's just say they're not as common as the 4" version. They do show, fairly often.

Since these great guns are now being discovered by all walks of life, the price is escalating.

A decent shooter should fetch $350. Lots of variables that will make them sell for a little less, or a whole lot more.

WAYNO.
 
Just out of curiousity, what would make them worth "a whole lot more" than $350 or so?
 
Condition, box, shipper, owners manual, "U" or "D" serial number, small numbers roll marked, which grip frame, etc.
 
Bigtubby,
Is it a Type I Low back Frame or a Type II High back frame, what caliber (.38 or .357)

IMHO a mint Type I Frame gun in SS would command a premium. I have
one a shooter and $350.0 - $400.00 would not buy it, if it was "Mint"then
$500.00 would not be out of line. Serial # and pic's would help.
Terry
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
About two months ago, I picked up a square-butt 2.75" Security Six for $275, no box and Pachmayrs. It's not quite a beater, still locks up tight, and will make a dandy trail gun.
 
T.A. WORKMAN said:
Bigtubby,
Is it a Type I Low back Frame or a Type II High back frame, what caliber (.38 or .357)

IMHO a mint Type I Frame gun in SS would command a premium. I have
one a shooter and $350.0 - $400.00 would not buy it, if it was "Mint"then
$500.00 would not be out of line. Serial # and pic's would help.
Terry

It is a type II highback .357
 
I have a 4" SS Security Six that I like so much that I started looking for a 2-3/4" version. After a couple of months of looking, I found and quickly snatched up this 30 year old unfired NIB Security six with all the paperwork. They are nice little revolvers.
020-1.jpg

019.jpg

041-1.jpg

050-1.jpg
 
You're killing me with all this gun porn! Those are my favorite revolvers of all time. Nice catch!!

How spendy is that gun rack?
 
timnc said:
Thanks. Glad mine isn't worth "a whole lot more" because I really enjoy shooting it.

No offense intended, my friend, but remarks like this usually make me chuckle a bit.

Oh, I understand the urge to preserve a nice gun, even if it is only mildly collectable. If I owned Colt SAA #1, I wouldn't be out shooting it, believe me.
But I do buy some nice guns, guns that will appreciate in value. And my thinking is, "I can buy this fine gun, enjoy shooting it, take good care of it, and if I eventually sell it I probably won't be able to retire off the proceeds, but I'll recoup cost of owning it and enjoying it."
 
My sentiments exactly. I just want to make sure I haven't somehow stumbled onto the "mother lode" by accident. No offense taken. I'm glad I made someone laugh today.
 
hittman said:
Pops 1 said:
What year did they make the change? Pops

2nd year of production which, I think, would have been '73.

While not widely recognized as such, first year of production was 1970. The frame change came about in mid 1974 for blue guns and a bit later for stainless. My earliest blue new frame gun, which is also the earliest reported to RENE, is 150-94446 and shipped June, 1974. The stainless old frame guns generally went up to about 151-08xxx with at least a couple of oddball 6" guns ranging up to at least 151-26549 (my old frame GA-36). I'm not sure if any new frame stainless guns shipped until 1975.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top