Ruger missed again!

While my favorite 10/22's in order are my;
1966 mfg/3rd yr./Manlicher/Redfield 4x
1969 mfg/Finger Groove Sporter
1974 mfg/Walnut/Metal Butt & b.band
1981 mfg/DSP/Walnut Sporter Checkered
No picture…😳


I also really like my Late Model Builds & Custom Shop,,,
with the Second from the top gun being my 50th Anniversary submission… a heavily modified Model 1261.
52974886485_b33e0653c4_k.jpg
Custom Shop now wears a Leupold Patrol.
53006326993_07ea8f0223_k.jpg


I get it!!!,,, do something that celebrates a historical offering,,, But that has never happened … ie; The 40th with a SLUG added to the butt stock…🙄
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
"Sadly no Rugers or related Family, or anyone old enough to understand history."

True enough. While many of the management folks at Ruger are older,, I don't think many of them have the "connection" of feeling like we old time Ruger fans have for the older types of guns. Blue steel, walnut, classic lines, are really heartwarming. Bill had an appreciation for such stuff,,, AND so did the buyers of his era. Once the company went public,, and people who bought stock wanted to profit,, it did create some subtle changes over time. Once Bill & the family were out of the company,, corporate types,, who who are both stockholders & want to make bigger profits,, look at what the marketing departments say is the direction they should go to sell a lot. Which also points to this;

"Nostalgia ain't selling well ….. new buyers is what they're chasing."

Sadly,, us older folks are more nostalgic than the younger crowd. That is evidenced by the general attitude of many nowadays in everything they buy. The attitude of; "I want it to look good, and if it breaks, throw it away & get a new one." Older stuff in most areas is more & more of a niche market. When it comes to firearms,, we old curmudgeons are way behind the "modern gun types" that the younger folks want. Black, plastic, tactical, etc are what the younger types want.
We older folks grew up with westerns, sixguns, lever guns, and the like. Bill understood this,, and was able to build the company on what others left behind. While westerns & older movies or TV shows still enjoy some popularity they are lagging behind. I've heard of kids nowadays refusing to watch any TV or movies that were made prior to the 1990's. They say "It's too old & the graphics are lame" kind of stuff.

So trying to sell a lot of guns,, Ruger is trying to cater to the younger crowd,, while using time proven designs. We old pharts who prefer a more classic type of gun,, well,, we are slowly losing ground. Our numbers are lower because we are getting old & passing on. And our preferences aren't what the mass market wants.
Heck,, just look at how often we discover real treasures in a gun shop or pawn shop or an estate where the younger family swapped off a prized Ruger for something "more modern."

I too would have preferred to see more "classic" stuff to celebrate the 75th Anniversary,, but I also understand why they made the guns they are offering.
 
On the Ruger website they do have blued and Walnut 75th anniversary 10-22s.
 
There has always been a faction at Ruger looking for the money - I once had a conversation with Anthony Imperato about the barrel band on their little 1894/22 which I had bought (maybe 18 years ago i guess) and was surprised to find had a plastic barrel band. I sent an email and he called and offered a metal band. I told him I was ok with the model since that is what it shipped with, but curious about the decision. He pretty much said it was his dad's idea for cost cutting and he'd tried to talk him out of it.

@contender is right, Bill Ruger almost never went for cost cutting - I say almost because there had to have been some instances. But forging vs machining is a good example of not backing down for cost, and of course half of what most of us appreciate in these firearms is their being overbuilt... I would have to assume that current management has to contend with such things as acquisitions when making financial decisions whereas Bill Ruger usually came by his choices through his built-in aesthetics. Clearly he was right about many of those choices, but you can't expect many people to be as good as him at determining what the market wants/lacks.
 
Last edited:
So the 75th Anniversary 10/22's come with either Walnut Stained or Natural Finish Hardwood stocks, correct? My question is, which Hardwood have they chosen to build these stocks from?
 
So the 75th Anniversary 10/22's come with either Walnut Stained or Natural Finish Hardwood stocks, correct? My question is, which Hardwood have they chosen to build these stocks from?

I'm thinking it looks like and is Birch or Beech.

Another interesting observation with the 60 Year Collector Series, a RED Trigger and it's not even the BX Trigger.
1704383534599.jpeg


The 2, 75 year DSP's,,,, Standard Trigger Group also...🙄
 
Last edited:
I actually saw and held a 75th 10-22 today. It was ok. The only 75th on it was on the bolt.
 
IDK, I like it. Ruger has made plenty of wood stocked models already. I'd like to see an even more tacticool version, with a buffer tube so I could use any AR stock I wanted, and a pistol grip. Also, an aluminum bull barrel with a steel liner, free floated. Blaspheme, I know ;-)
 
IDK, I like it. Ruger has made plenty of wood stocked models already. I'd like to see an even more tacticool version, with a buffer tube so I could use any AR stock I wanted, and a pistol grip. Also, an aluminum bull barrel with a steel liner, free floated. Blaspheme, I know ;-)
No, not blasphemy…I completely understand that there are a wide variety of tastes and Ruger should and does appeal to many of them. I just think that the anniversary guns should have some connection to the model’s roots/history….

Ruger could offer two different anniversary models and satisfy both the old and new tastes!!
 
I looked on the Ruger website this week, maybe it was yesterday. They sure are making a lot of models of lots of firearms. One of the SP models I've been looking for is back in stock---IF I can find local I'll buy with cash. Don't want to order.

Do I like everything Ruger has to offer---NO.

From the 75 Anniversary selections I do like the MK IV. The others not so much.

That 60th series 10/22 looks interesting but not really in the buying market for that.

I hope that whatever Ruger makes they sell a lot of them regardless of whether I like the particular model or not, I'm sure I'll find something I do like.
 
I believe it was priced at retail, $399.00, but that's where the negotiations begin.
In 1975 I paid $57.25 for a 10-22 from Monkey Ward. I was making the princely sum of $3 and hour at the time. Of course it's long gone courtesy of a family member who thought his drug habit was more important than my property. Damn I hate thieves...
 
In 1975 I paid $57.25 for a 10-22 from Monkey Ward. I was making the princely sum of $3 and hour at the time. Of course it's long gone courtesy of a family member who thought his drug habit was more important than my property. Damn I hate thieves...
I can't remember when I got my first 10/22. I was born in 1947 and my mind like my body is slowly fading. But I do know I really like them. I also remember making 75 cents an hour on my first job.
20230423_044455.jpg
20230423_043753.jpg
 
No offense, but I really tire of hearing about how the "bean counters" and "greedy owners" and "making money" are the evil downsides of Ruger and other companies.

Firearms, like every other business has to make a profit. Like it or not, that is how they keep the doors open. The market is determined by the customer. Ruger or anyone else doesn't get to decide what people like, that is an individual choice. The bottom line is if they can't make a profit, it is a waste of time and resources. Businesses make what the consumer is asking for.

My first handgun was a Ruger Single Six. I have several 10/22's, a couple single sixes, and a security six in stainless. Love them all but I see the Ruger handguns in a totally different category than I do the Smiths and Colts. Have a BIL who was a Ruger collector/accumulator fanatic. He had a large collection by most any standard. When it came time to liquidate, he was surprised that many did not appreciate nearly has much as many of my Smiths had. That is fine, just tells a different story about the firearm. I can go to shows and find older Rugers all day long. They hold their value as rugged, nice shooting firearms that will get the job done. That was their market and to an extent, still is.

For me, the 1911 75th anniversary is the only one in the bunch that catches my eye. I have several of the walnut and laminated stocks of older models but that is not the market of today's customers. Ruger didn't get where it is by being stupid and not knowing about their customers but go ahead and blame it on the accounting department or the young kid who took over the company from dear old dad and doesn't know a 22 from a 357. Rant over
 
Back
Top