That depends on the individual. You're talking about custom gun work and that loses many people right off the bat. I love custom guns and would much rather have a $500 gun with $1500 worth of custom work than four $500 guns. IMHO, the flat-top configuration is much better looking than the eared version. I don't consider ~$300 bad at all for such an extensive modification that has such a pleasing effect. It can also be the most cost-effective way to get what you want. Even with the new flat-tops on the market. While it costs about the same to have a flat-top converted to a Bisley as it does to flat-top a factory Bisley, Bisley conversion parts are not exactly growing on trees anymore. It's a nice option to have.Chief said:This does not seem practical to me. More work/cost than it is worth.
Thanks to all,
Ralph
Aggie01 said:This has a Bowen old model (no Bump) rear sight in it.
If the pivot pin is low enough in the top strap, you can do this with no welding and have a square tang flattop.
Hondo44 said:Aggie01 said:This has a Bowen old model (no Bump) rear sight in it.
If the pivot pin is low enough in the top strap, you can do this with no welding and have a square tang flattop.
Nothing wrong with that look in IMO. Plus one can do that for free. The pins in the Blackhawks are usually not a problem, it's the Super Single Sixes old and new models that are iffy. But looks just as good on them as well and makes them very unique.
Chief said:Hondo44 said:Aggie01 said:This has a Bowen old model (no Bump) rear sight in it.
If the pivot pin is low enough in the top strap, you can do this with no welding and have a square tang flattop.
Nothing wrong with that look in IMO. Plus one can do that for free. The pins in the Blackhawks are usually not a problem, it's the Super Single Sixes old and new models that are iffy. But looks just as good on them as well and makes them very unique.
I agree. Nice looking revolver. Can you use the original sight also?
Ralph