I sold two frames and barrels (.35 Rem and 45/.410) a few years ago and have always regretted it.I’ve shot Contenders since the early 80’s. Never found that to be true. Then, I only have three frames now.![]()
I had one frame and several barrels for years before I started collecting frame variations. I just like finding different variations of the frames. Flathead screw on hammer, flathead screw on hammer with sliding hammer-block safety, Left/right/middle switch for RF,CF, and safety…. Easy-open frame vs original design….I have 19 barrels 1 frame. They aren’t hard to change.
Your prerogative Tyrone.I disagree with the above analogy.
I've had T/C Contenders for over 40 years. And with what I paid for my stuff, I could easily sell & make money. I also have all I need or want in them. And feeding them is easier than the bottom feeding semi-auto shell slingers as well as cheaper.
I load 14 Calibers. Long ago,I decided to have a Barrel for each.I disagree with the above analogy.
I've had T/C Contenders for over 40 years. And with what I paid for my stuff, I could easily sell & make money. I also have all I need or want in them. And feeding them is easier than the bottom feeding semi-auto shell slingers as well as cheaper.
The bases, rings, and scope all go on/with the barrel.BULL'S-EYE,, you are correct in the "bases, rings, scopes" additions to a Contender set-up. But again,, judicious shopping, and keeping these things for use & such,, if I were to sell such stuff, I can often get more out of it than what I put into it. Example; I've bought a few Leupold scopes long ago. Now,, with the fact they are no longer made,, I can get much more than what I paid for them. The same goes for the barrels.
So in my case,, it's not money down the drain,, it's money in the bank!