I think a physical dispute between two angry people is the opposite of "cold blood".
Why do young killers make you more mad than adult killers?
I was trolling today as well...just for fish instead of phishing.
DFTT
I think a physical dispute between two angry people is the opposite of "cold blood".
Why do young killers make you more mad than adult killers?
Since you asked, I’ve been thinking about this horror since it was reported. I believe he went in knowing he wanted to stick someone. He wasn’t welcomed, he had a bad azz attitude, he was outnumbered, he wouldn’t leave when asked, he was threatening and he made good on it and as evidence showed the sticking wasn’t warranted. He wasn’t there to steal because he was exposed right away. He wasn’t there to rip-off but to shiv him a cracker. This is the mind of a subhuman thug.Why would Anthony want so badly to be under that tent belonging to another team? Ya know, a tent where they kept their gym bags while competing. Their gym bags, which probably contained maybe their wallets, watches, and cell phones, while they're busy competing. What plausible reason would he want to be under that tent? Just asking for a friend. OTOH, why would Metcalf and his team not want a stranger under their tent? Ya know, a tent where they kept their gym bags while competing. Their gym bags, which probably contained maybe their wallets, watches, and cell phones, while they're busy competing. What plausible reason would they have for not wanting a stranger from another school under their tent while they're busy competing? Again, asking for a friend.
It’s irrelevant that ‘his’ team didnt have a tent, also irrelevant that he might have been seeking shelter from any rain. No one else tried forcing themselves into area that they know is reserved for team members. It’s also irrelevant that that it didnt have sides, trying to make an irrelevant point while it’s been called a tent by all the outlets. Maybe you should be a defense attorney and try to get a murderer acquitted because prosecutors used the wrong overhead description, good luck with that. Your defense thus far has been seriously lacking and so was Anthony’s attorneys while the Prosecution was very enlightening.Someone testified today that his team did not have a tent and tried to get out of the rain in a dugout, but a coach told them to get out of that, so they went to the tent. According to court TV.
The tent has no sides. It is an awning.
Okay, we'll just call it premeditated murder.So you're just a dumb racist from Texas? (See how that works?) Or can you discuss stuff on a discussion forum without resorting to prejudice against where I currently live?
But yeah, the term cold blood usually applies to murders that don't start with disagreements and escalation, but are the kind where someone is killed for something like financial reasons or to eliminate a witness. The victim bears no responsibility for his death, but the incident was physical.
So, I guess you are saying it is worth getting into a fight or killing another human being as long as you stay dry.
Agree! Better yet. Put him on ignore let him argue with himself.DFTT
That's an odd conclusion. I was saying that it didn't appear to be an attempt at theft.So, I guess you are saying it is worth getting into a fight or killing another human being as long as you stay dry.
If it was. Generally bar fights and the like aren't. In court you'd have to show motive and evidence of premeditation. Usually having a multitool isn't good evidence of the latter. Pretty clearly 2nd degree, though.Okay, we'll just call it premeditated murder.
There was testimony that he was in one or two events.They also said he skipped his physical therapy appointment to go to the meet he wasn’t participating in.
I'm sorry, you seem to be confused. I was pointing out that theft didn't seem to be the motive for going under the awning because he would have been seen and he didn't plan to go to the tent.It’s irrelevant that ‘his’ team didnt have a tent, also irrelevant that he might have been seeking shelter from any rain. No one else tried forcing themselves into area that they know is reserved for team members. It’s also irrelevant that that it didnt have sides, trying to make an irrelevant point while it’s been called a tent by all the outlets. Maybe you should be a defense attorney and try to get a murderer acquitted because prosecutors used the wrong overhead description, good luck with that. Your defense thus far has been seriously lacking and so was Anthony’s attorneys while the Prosecution was very enlightening.
100s of hot takes on Karmelo Anthony trial. Here's mine: Karmelo supporters wanted him found not guilty to justify their use of violence every time they don't get their way. This event and this trial is both an example and a catalyst of how increasingly racist America has become/is becoming. 10 years ago, I really didn't pay much attention to race. Now it's at the forefront of my mind in every public encounter. This is not societal progress. And, it is absolutely by design.
National destabilization is the goal.
I weep for my nation.
National destabilization is the goal.
I weep for my nation.
I think prayers for the family are more than in order and I agree. But none of this is off point.I think ya' all are getting off point here--- a family lost their 17 year old son. My God, that would devastate me. I pray for the family.
The fact of the matter is both are relatively close to each other and all of them aren’t that far from where I live (and in the same general area). Or where my son goes to school for that matter.The trial isn't happening in Frisco TX.
Its at the Collin County Courthouse, which is located in McKinney TX.
Facts matter to me, not sure they matter in the court room.
For those who don't know, the Collin County courthouse is in a rather rural setting just north of US 75 and Highway 380. It's in a large green belt with not much around it. If there is a guilty verdict, the way the perimeter is set up, they pretty much have the protesters kettled up. While the Sheriff's department doesn't play, it will be interesting to see how they respond. Hopefully, their masters will not have a tight leash. If there is any rioting, I expect it to be minor and limited to McKinney and Frisco. Dallas downtown is pretty much sealed off with security for the World Cup soccer games. It appears most of the protesters are from out of town and out of state.The trial isn't happening in Frisco TX.
Its at the Collin County Courthouse, which is located in McKinney TX.
Facts matter to me, not sure they matter in the court room.
I'm a little slow to this party, but ain't nobody blaming the knifeI understand what you are saying. But I refuse to blame the knife. The knife didn’t commit a crime.
Merely having the knife isn’t unsportsmanlike conduct. The way he acted was unsportsmanlike, what he did was criminal and he deserves severe consequences.
Because he is a troll.Why do you folks get down on RX-79G?
I was responding to this post.I'm a little slow to this party, but ain't nobody blaming the knife
This is no different than blaming a gun. I’ve had a knife with me since I was pre teen, I’ve never been unsportsmanlike. I’ve never committed a crime with it much less a murder.Ahhhhh, nothing screams "Sportsmanship" like bringing a knife to a HS track meet..... but then, I guess this track meet was merely a prelude to eluding the cops . . . . .![]()
I don't see that... I suspect some here would call me the same when I disagree with them... now I have seen some post recently that are kind of interesting but not from this guy... these read like someone in their mothers basement watching too much network TV. Almost like the famous post 20+ years ago by the mall cop.. what was his name Gecko45 or such?Because he is a troll.
Duly noted that "relatively close " is your standard about false information.The fact of the matter is both are relatively close to each other and all of them aren’t that far from where I live (and in the same general area). Or where my son goes to school for that matter.
You start off by saying “nobody is blaming the knife”. Then go in to say “he shouldn’t have had the knife”.Geez.
The dude should not have had a knife in the first place on school property.
Yes, I know that some of you carried a knife everywhere. But in 1950 it was not an issue. In 2026 it is.
Maybe the black guys a thug. Maybe the white guy was an ass.
Either way there was no reason for the kid to be there, with a knife, not in his own tent, and if he wasn't participating in the meet he shouldn't have been there in the first place.
Some of y'all need help.
I still don't understand how you got to that point because NOBODY said the knife was at fault. It was stated that the guy should not have brought a knife to a track meet, and that is a fair point, because, as previously pointed out, knives are prohibited on school property.I guess my point is, having the knife didn’t mean he went there to commit murder. Possessing the knife doesn’t equate to pre meditation.
We don’t need more knife laws anymore than we need more gun laws.