jrc270 said:
Although, they are now discontinued, the article tends to dispell many of the clunky, huge, tales of the P90...
The article compares a P90 to a 1911. You have always heard how a 1911 is so thin, and how bulky a P90 is.....
Simply put .... that review .... and I read every single word of it, was massively biased TOWARD the P90. The outcome in his mind was already made up.
The reviewer states .... "The low cost M1911, pictured upper left, is a good shooter, but only after several hundreds of dollars in parts changes and countless hours spent parts fitting."
That is just crap .... a 1911 needs nowhere near
'several hundreds of dollars' OR 'countless hours spent parts fitting'.
A standard Springfield MilSpec, Para Combat Expert, or decent RIA is in the same price range as the P90 at street prices, and they sure as hell don't need .... 'several hundreds of dollars in parts changes and countless hours spent parts fitting'.
The guy is a jackwagon who clearly had his mind made up what the outcome was going to be prior to putting a pen to paper.
If you've ever held a 1911 and a P90 back to back, you'd see how BIG those 'small dimensional differences' are.
If you're looking for a review that would reinforce a decision to buy a P90 over a 1911 ... then you found it ... buy a P90 and be happy, but in the real world, the two guns don't compare. If for no other reason than they're TOTALLY different actions. There is NO WAY that someone who wanted a SA 1911 would buy a P90 .... that notion would dies as soon as they touched the trigger .....
I'd also like to see a stock P90 with a 4 pound trigger pull ... well ... maybe after the three quarter inch of sloppy, gritty take up, it may be near there ....
a 1911 is a 1911 .... never to be remotely compared to a P90, except in the size of the pill that comes out the front.
I'm not bashing the P90 either ... I really like them and think they're the best centerfire semiauto Ruger ever made for accuracy, but the trigger alone puts a KP90 in a class that can't even be compared to a 1911. Also, to say that the P90's trigger is better than a Sig 220's, which is widely known to have one of the best SA triggers on amy SA/DA gun is either saying he doesn't know what he's talking about, OR he got a REALLY bad Sig P220.
Oh yeah .... and ANY gun that can't hold 2.5 inches 'pretty easily' at TEN YARDS should be thrown in the trash. That is certainly no great accomplishment, but the reviewer acts as if it is. That should tell you something right there.
It's also interesting that the 'unidentified' 1911 in the top pics is mentioned as a 'pretty good shooter', but the gun that he breaks down in the lower pictures
is a Colt Gold Cup. Why not list the 'pretty good shooter' and break THAT gun down ? My guess is that the 'pretty good shooter' was a highly modified big buck gun, and that he wanted to imply that the P90 compares, but didn't want to list the gun, since it would have been obviously apples and oranges to anybody who knows 1911's.
REV