California warning

Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
15,192
City & State/Province
Webster, MD.
You just never know where another California warning will appear. It is a range bag! Look at this one's warning:
http://shopruger.com/Ruger-Southport-Compact-Range-Bag/productinfo/19231/
 
Hi,

I wouldn't worry too much, unless you're gonna eat your range bag! I've been using products on the Prop 65 list since it came out, and still haven't come up with a birth defect. Should I be disappointed?

Rick C
 
Just another example of stupid laws,, forced upon many, by the idiots running the political system in California. Sadly,,, the good people in Ca. are outnumbered by these idiots.
To be able to sell a product in Ca. all manufacturers must disclose this kind of warning,, because of how Ca. law is written.
Those of us with common sense know when to ignore such stupid stuff.
 
redhawker said:
I can't wait until they start putting out warnings for dihydrogen monoxide exposure. Dangerous stuff.

Hi,

I got some of that on my shoes today. I was worried at first, but the soles haven't melted thru yet. It must have been the CA approved type... it was recycled!

I also worry about my tires: with the push to pure nitrogen fills, am I harming the environment by still using the old fashioned 78% mix I've always used? Who knows what nasties that other 22% contains! I should probably write Jerry Brown and ask him to sign an emergency executive order to require the old mix to be oxygenated to about 21% to make it cleaner. ;)

Rick C
 
This and many other warnings were and are to late for well over 75% of Californians because they already have birth defects from over-exposure to who the hell knows.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
THANK GOD you warned me.... I almost bought one of those range bags.... ;-))))
We're really lucky to have technically/intellecutally astute politicians to guide us through life...... :-
What would we do without them (pay less taxes; have less corruption; have lower medical costs etc)..?
J
 
I wonder if anyone EVER did not purchase that bag after reading that Cal. warning. Geez I hate liberalisim.
 
redhawker said:
I can't wait until they start putting out warnings for dihydrogen monoxide exposure. Dangerous stuff.
I heard it called "hydroxylic acid". Had some splash on me this morning but got it off before any real harm occurred. :D :roll:
I wonder; does exposure to Nancy Pelosi causes any permanent brain damage, and if so where is the warning label?
 
kramden said:
I wonder if anyone EVER did not purchase that bag after reading that Cal. warning. Geez I hate liberalisim.

Hi,

Hey, it says "Ruger" on it: for a lot of people, that will outweigh the Prop 65 sticker, AND the "Made in China" one that's probably on the bag, too. The same people who claim to hate liberalism find nothing wrong with supporting communism? What an interesting world we live in...

Rick C
 
Then there is this one that cannot be sold there:
http://shopruger.com/Ruger-Pro-Comp-Handgun-Case-Black/productinfo/19225/
It is stated: "This product is not currently available for sale to California customers due to requirements associated with the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65)."
 
You'd think there would be a warning that "this product may contain items that can cause serious bodily injury or death."

The California proposition 65 is one of those things that was not a bad idea at the onset but now is just a joke.
 
So you're going to take this range bag to a place where you handle and shoot lead bullets in a closed area with a bunch of amateurs. And CA has to warn you about the bag?? At least they've got their priorities straight.
 
Fox Mike said:
Then there is this one that cannot be sold there:
http://shopruger.com/Ruger-Pro-Comp-Handgun-Case-Black/productinfo/19225/
It is stated: "This product is not currently available for sale to California customers due to requirements associated with the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65)."
Somebody in CA must think you fill that bag with water and drink from it, I guess. Whoever passes these laws is obviously on some other kind of mind altering chemicals.
 
redhawker said:
I can't wait until they start putting out warnings for dihydrogen monoxide exposure. Dangerous stuff.

It is the single deadliest substance known to man. Too much of it or not enough of it has killed more people than any other single substance.

The virus', bacteria, molds and yeasts that breed therein, not to mention the macro biological vectors have killed millions.
 
Aliso Viejo, a town in California came close to banning dihydrogen monoxide a while back.

In their rush to be environmentally and politically correct, they came close to banning it.
 
Ka6otm said:
Aliso Viejo, a town in California came close to banning dihydrogen monoxide a while back.

In their rush to be environmentally and politically correct, they came close to banning it.

This was already spoken about. Obviously you didn't read the entire post. :roll: :D http://www.rugerforum.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=1&p=2733046
 
Back
Top