45 Colt/Schofield Chrony Data

sourdough44

Single-Sixer
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
466
City & State/Province
WI
I tested a few loads today. Since I went through the chronograph setup & all I thought I would post my findings. This is what I got, as usual, your experience may vary.

The gun was a Ruger Redhawk, 45 Colt with a 4.2" barrel. The temp was about 80, though the ammo was mostly at basement temps since it was shot in the back yard soon after coming out.

The 1st load was the 45 Schofield, 200 grn home cast .452(45 acp) bullet. This is the Lee TL mold. The powder was 5.8 grains of H Titegroup. The fps average was 733. As expected a very mild load.

The next 2 loads used a 265 grain Cast Performance Hardcast GC'ed .452 bullet. These are also in the mid & upper 'Ruger Only' range. I researched from several articles in Handloader magazine & several reloading manuals. Both were right near 1.60" COL.

10 grains of Unique(20,000 psi range, from HL mag) gave 968 fps average. The recoil was full but quite controllable.

23.5 grains of win-296(H-110) gave 1096 fps average. The blast was a fair amount more than the Unique, but still nothing uncontrollable. There was also more blast blowing the grass around near the chrony.

Looking at some charges listed and fps achieved I believe there is still some safety margin on the upside, with the Redhawk. I also realize my 4.2" barrel is shorter than used with most/all of the test data listed. After this test I plan to go with the win-296 loading. The use is for backup on a B bear hunt and maybe use in AK when the bear spray isn't enough.
 
SD44, I am a little amazed at the velocity of your W296/H110 load of 23.5 grains behind a 265 grain slug. I load 23 grains of H110 behind a 335 grain cast GC bullet in my Vaquero w/ 4 5/8" barrel for a muzzle +10' velocity of 1293 ft/sec. Does your Redhawk have a large barrel to cylinder gap? Bear in mind, the load I shoot is full power and not for the faint of heart. My normal load is a 270 grain Keith style bullet over 9 grains of Universal and it is a lot tamer to shoot.
 
Yes I do see the data just above me that shows up in the 1300fps range, usually a longer barrel. I have used a chronograph for several years, about the 7 foot from the gun distance(handgun). I will admit much of the time my speeds are less than "book". The cylinder gap on this Redhawk seems rather normal, though I have not measured. I also like to stay a little on the safe side of the envelope when approaching max loads. My normal shooting,plinking, & target loads are much less(Titegroup,H-Universal,Unique). I was in AK this June & next time I may jump through the hoops to bring the Redhawk up. The Son wants to go more remote on the next visit.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top