Yup. As soon as they can not sell every one of the 1911s they make.t-reg said:Anyone think we will ever see a Ruger 1911 in .40 S&W. ?
Used to have a .44 Automag - I'm guessing that's not what you had in mind.5of7 said:Speaking of that, and your sig line, makes me wonder...why not design a rimless version of the .44 Special for semi auto pistols?
The mag and mag well are both a bit too long to be ideal for the .40 S&W.cas said:.40 S&W 1911's can be fussy feeders. Pumping out mass produced guns, it may be more trouble than Ruger wants.
sliclee said:lr- you cant compare forged metal to cast iron
ruger has quite a bit of trouble with the 1911. They are in the stage of send them out no matter, we'll fix them later.
When Colt first made the 10 frames were cracking because metal wasnt strong enough. A 45 frame is not that strong.
I remember testing hot ammo 45acp a Rem 185+P the third shot the slide went too far back and cracked stuck.
You cant compare a 45 at 1000 to a 10 at 1500
I have 2 10's from Colt in polished SS. They have automatic bullet tracking. I must have at least 70K rounds thru them apiece. They are perfect.
cas said:If you have a cast iron Ruger it's probably worth a lot of money to a collector.
sliclee said:DA=if and when they make a 40 or 10 the first shot will be that g-d damed BUG of yours. Lee
sliclee said:DA=if and when they make a 40 or 10 the first shot will be that g-d damed BUG of yours. Lee
Pat-inCO said:Who "needs" a 1911 in a caliber between 9mm and .45ACP? :shock: