Yawn said:
hey... I have never been on the rimfire forum before... so hello... we have a close family friend who is now disabled in her hands. She is limited in what she can hold in her dominant right hand and that hand has a lot of pain. Her left is better. She has had a DA/SA .380 for home protection but we are pretty sure that even if with adrenaline, she was able to work the trigger/hammer, the recoil after the first shot would send the gun flying. So, I was wondering what the recoil is on some of the .22 guns. I have only shot a 10/22 rifle in that caliber but there was zero recoil... is there a handgun with the same recoil profile? Anyway, thanks for your time and suggestions!
Well, a .22lr for home defense is better than throwing a chihuahua at the intruder, but I can't really recommend it as a true man stopper, unless you are a GREAT shot with adrenaline in your system and you put the whole mag into the right part of the body.
I did hear of someone being dropped by a .22lr to the heart from a rifle at short range, but that is different.
Before I make my recommendation, I'd want to know what type of .380 she shot. Like was mentioned, the blow-back operation types [PPK, etc] have a sharp recoil. Actually, my grandmother's PPK has a worse [to me] recoil than any of my 9mm pistols, including a Kahr K9 or M&P 9c. Of the two, I would recommend the M&P 9c as it is easier to clear a malfunction.
I would actually recommend something a little different: a .38special revolver. A .22lr has [normally] a muzzle energy reading of somewhere around 130lb/ft. A .380acp has a muzzle energy reading of around 200-230 lb/ft. A .38special can be had with muzzle energy readings of 165 lb/ft up to +P of 290 lb/ft energy. The .38special rounds I generally use in my old Rossi are around 220 lb/ft.
So, about the same stopping power as the .380acp cartridge. HOWEVER, I contend most .38 special revolvers will be easier on the hand than a .380acp semi-auto will.
If this is purely self-defense and trigger pull is a major issue, then I'd recommend either the Ruger SP101 or the LCP.
Last week I spent 2 hours with a older female friend of the family at the LGS looking over firearms. She was concerned with home defense as well as range use. She is in her 50s and was concerned about being able to pull the trigger in her 70s also.
She couldn't rack the slide comfortably on any auto-loader [in .380 or 9mm] other than the Glock G19, and she wasn't sure she could do that in 20 years.
She tried the triggers on 4 different S&W revolvers in .38 as well as the GP100/SP101/LCR from Ruger, and then the obligatory Taurus and Rossi to cover the bases.
She couldn't pull the trigger on the Taurus/Rossi pistols. On the others she felt the most comfortable with the LCR and the SP101 [3" barrel].
I've taken her shooting. She found the 9mm bearable, but almost too much. The .22lr was fine. The .38special she was fine, but her index finger got tired of DA shots after 18 rounds. No problems managing recoil though.
And she is pretty weak in hand strength.
Just my observations. Good luck!