1957 RST4

[daveg.inkc]

,

 

[daveg.inkc]

This is my RST4 with extra "C" in company 95% Standard I bought with box, no papers. Of course , it shoots great.

 

[GRAMPS 51]

Hi nice find

Gramps

 

[daveg.inkc]

Thanks,, walked into LGS, clerk handed me this Ruger, with a $190.00 price tag. Could not get wallet out fast enough. I just said, "Please start paper work!"http://i.imgur.com/gi9TzHyl.jpg,

 

[daveg.inkc]

It has no bluing loss, seems to be shot very little

 

[contender]

Rollmark error!!!!!!!! Where is the Radical one? He'd be salivating over this one!

NICE find!

 

[daveg.inkc]

Thanks Contender, I'd say this is 98-99% No blue loss, a small scratch on top like someone used knife tip to extract a F T F. Other than that, that was my birth year, so I had to have it.

 

[chet15]

The pics aren't coming up for me....can somebody send to my email [email protected]?
Chet15

 

[daveg.inkc]

I emailed them Chet. Let me know if you get them. dave

 

[daveg.inkc]

They are not very good pictures

 

[chet15]

They are not very good pictures

That's interesting. Not sure how that would happen since it doesn't look like the rest of the rollmark is doubled.
Maybe the rollmark was almost off the grid when the receiver was marked the first time?
Not sure.
Chad

 

[daveg.inkc]

I posted about this when I first got it. Did not notice in gun store. I saw it when I took apart to clean. It comes apart easy. Reassemble in 30 seconds. That day at store, dealer showed me how Mark IV work. This went back together just as fast.

 

[daveg.inkc]

They are not very good pictures

That's interesting. Not sure how that would happen since it doesn't look like the rest of the rollmark is doubled.
Maybe the rollmark was almost off the grid when the receiver was marked the first time?
Not sure.
Chad

You are right Chet,, has an extra "C" Maybe "C"'s were cheap in '57,,,,,