SR1911SHOOTER said:
Wayno,
Don't worry about it. I would imagine that it happens once in a lifetime.
I spent 20 years in the Navy, and on one destroyer I was on, A shipmate of
mine was a Chief Gunners Mate. We talked about guns off duty in the Chiefs
Mess, and He never mentioned anything like that happening on any 1911.
And, when I was in, we had never heard of any thing as wimpy and M9!
I have also owned 1911s for about 65 years, and never had an instance
of that happening.
Blackie
BTW, You didn't say. were those cartridges +p or +P+ by any chance??
As an Army Ordnanceman, I've been around a lot of 1911's. I've repaired many, and I also never personally witnessed this type of failure in a 1911 .45 ACP. Yep, it's probably and hopefully a once in a lifetime failure, other than we now know of 3 similar failures since the release of this SR1911 10mm.
No, these were not +P's. I don't find there is any criteria for +P in a 10mm, as the original SAAMI loading was already plenty hot, before the FBI decided to load them down to where girls could shoot them without spoiling their manicure.
Much of the factory 180 grain ammo is loaded in the 1050 to 1100 fps spectrum, and I don't expect most folks would have ever shot the higher performing Cor-Bon, Underwood, Buffalo Bore, Double Tap, or even this Federal Premium Trophy Bonded ammo. And if I had never stepped up to this better performing ammo, I might have never experienced this failure.
So I continue to beg the same question...Would this gun have failed if I was only shooting the really low power stuff, or was stepping up 200 fps the straw that broke the camels back? I would have hoped that with such a failure, Ruger would have tested the gun with more realistic ammo.
It really doesn't matter now, as Ruger has declared this gun repaired. I will have to shoot a lot of ammo in this gun before I will ever trust it to carry it, and I will have to shoot some hot stuff to really know if the gun is up to it.