It is pretty much their function to think they know everything and to impose on others what they want the situation to be.
Not true. Most times it is a gentle 'educational' moment. Most people I know will simply say "I got it" and start using the correct terminology after being 'enlightened' so to speak. Seems quite straight forward to me. Others (like the "low information voters" that are out there) get offended when shown the correct usage (or facts) and will continue to gum up the works. I really don't 'get it' but there it is. In my work as a programmer interfacing to electrical engineers, if I started calling components by 'pet names', discussions might be a bit complicated just sorting out what we mean. But if we stick with the correct terminology things go 'a lot' smoother. Quite simple actually. Knowledge is meant to be shared, and those that don't know should be 'happy' to learn more about what they are using and doing. Makes for a more 'productive' discussions later. Again seems really logical to me. The Old Model and New Model terminology usage is a 'very very' easy concept to master -- I would think anyway. Knowing that and applying it to the original Vaquero and New Vaquero should be easy. <sigh> Then Nuff said.
Timbo22, thanks for the information! Have to file that away

.
Moot point for me. I imagine any Vaquero will hold any 357 load i throw at it.
You imagined correctly

. Really the .357 'belongs' on the New Vaquero . The original Vaquero is just 'over kill' for this cartridge.