This sometimes heated argument has been going on in some of the relative threads, so as redundant as it may be to some folks, I think we need to know for sure...
Ruger, specifically describes the slides on the SR9c as either stainless, or blackened alloy.
This, copied from Ruger's website...
"A variation of the SR9c that boasts a unique, high-tech, Nitrodox Pro Black finish over the alloy steel slide and high-performance, glass-filled nylon frame."
also from their website...
SR9c™
Brushed Stainless
Blackened Alloy
SR9®
Brushed Stainless
Blackened Stainless
So, if a body was to buy the blackened model, and discovered it is not stainless, underneath, but the seller insists it is blackened stainless, who might be guilty of misrepresentation?
And I am fully aware that the full-size SR9 is advertised as blackened stainless. This contributes to the confusion, and to the argument.
WAYNO.
Ruger, specifically describes the slides on the SR9c as either stainless, or blackened alloy.
This, copied from Ruger's website...
"A variation of the SR9c that boasts a unique, high-tech, Nitrodox Pro Black finish over the alloy steel slide and high-performance, glass-filled nylon frame."
also from their website...
SR9c™
Brushed Stainless
Blackened Alloy
SR9®
Brushed Stainless
Blackened Stainless
So, if a body was to buy the blackened model, and discovered it is not stainless, underneath, but the seller insists it is blackened stainless, who might be guilty of misrepresentation?
And I am fully aware that the full-size SR9 is advertised as blackened stainless. This contributes to the confusion, and to the argument.
WAYNO.