Looks nice. I figured it would be and it'll be super expensive like it was before.
Some folks just don't get that and seemingly, never will.It was expensive compared to an 870, but it was cheap for a quality O/U.
What needed changing was it was over-priced. That's why it was a sales failure. Not sure what else there was to "get". If it's too much this time, all the fanboys will buy one and then sales will plummet. Just like the last time...just like the 336.I also am curious what changed, and why they thought it needed changing.
Well, I don't want to disappoint you, so I will be the first...I think the fore end release button could probably be a half a millimeter longer......:ROFLMAO:Great looking gun. I’m sure there’ll be plenty that some will find wrong with it. Just a sign of the times …..:cautious:
NIB previous design are around on gunbrokerHoping Ruger will have a sporting Red Label. If so, and it doesn't take forever to come out I will take a serious look at it vs the Browning CXS I'm currently considering.
NIB previous design are around on gunbroker
What needed changing was it was over-priced. That's why it was a sales failure. Not sure what else there was to "get". If it's too much this time, all the fanboys will buy one and then sales will plummet. Just like the last time...just like the 336.
I have a couple of sporting clays NIB in both 12, 20 and even a Woodside ClaysI specifically want a sporting clays model not a field model. Plus I like the blued receiver of the new Red Label.
As usual, the downers are just chronic complainers who were never gonna buy one anyway. In the real world of twice-barrel shotguns, the Red Label was ALWAYS the affordable option.Oh I am excited to see this release!
And all you Debbie Downers, sorry you're hating it already.:rolleyes:
I threw the "get" part in after I read someone else's comment. Not meant to point at you. I agree about the part interchangeability as well but had to mention the reason Ruger stopped making it before. Ruger stops producing what doesn't sell because they're smart.My question about what changes were made is from a mechanical perspective. Mostly curious about parts interchangeability.
In my post I mentioned they probably streamlined and cut costs.
I didn’t say I didn’t “get” anything.
When I took it to the trap or skeet ranges, they all looked down their noses at my Ruger.
That didn’t take very long, see post #3Great looking gun. I’m sure there’ll be plenty that some will find wrong with it. Just a sign of the times …..:cautious:
Exactly! The most accurate assessment possible.The Red Label doesn’t have a target audience. Too much money for a red necks field gun, not prestigious enough for the snobs.
I didn't say there was anything wrong with it... I said I was concerned with the V3 modifier and hoping it hadn't changed too much.That didn’t take very long, see post #3![]()
The receiver looks blued in the picture. I hope that's the case.
The more things change the more they stay the same. Amazing how many Middle ( substitute mediocre) Managers mistake motion for progress.It was expensive compared to an 870, but it was cheap for a quality O/U.
I bought mine because it was the only American Made O/U available at the time.
I also am curious what changed, and why they thought it needed changing.