22short
Bearcat
In recent weeks I have purchased two new Ruger firearms that I've been looking at for some time and finally got the gumption and funding to purchase them. Both happened to be Lipsey model Rugers but that is not why I purchased them per se but more for the right calibers in the right gun. The first was the Single Seven in the .327 magnum which I think is a great caliber in a really nice gun, and the second a 77/22 magnum with the Mannlicher stock.
The problem is that on the .327 Single Seven after a couple of cylinders of shooting the pin holding the rear site in the frame is protruding at least a 1/4 inch if not more from the right side of the gun. Had I not noticed it while at the range the other day I might have lost it completely.
The second issue was on the 77/22. Right after getting the gun I purchased a new scope and proceeded to mount it. I noticed the front of the scope was touching the rear sight and it was not yet fully tightened. I turn the gun sideways and noticed that I have two different scope rings each of a differing height. The one in the rear is higher than the front mount, hence my problem with the rear sight. In looking at the manual that came with the gun both should have been the number four. One was a four and the other a five which is taller.
I call Ruger today with these issues and the nice lady said on the scope mount send it back and they will send me a new one. On the sight pin on the Single Seven she said apply some blue lock-tite to it and if that doesn't work send it in as the hole is too big. No offer to send me a shipping tag or pay for costs of shipping on either. Is this common for Ruger and is this what I should expect? Both are new guns with very little use on either.
The scope rings not too big a deal as I can send them in and hope someone sends me the right ones back. However on the .327, a brand new gun and I'm instructed to apply some lock-tite and see if it works. It's my thinking that it is a new gun and I expected it to work from the get go. I don't think I should have to be doing any hillbilly gunsmithing on a new gun. Again an easy fix, if it works, but it just kind of strikes me that if I can get one that is correct for the same price why keep the one with the enlarged pin hole and hope that my sight pin stays in place. And if not then I have to deal with it again in the near or distant future.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on these things. One should they be sending me shipping labels for the returns and two would you be using lock-tite on your new gun hoping it works or send it back for a replacement? I really do like Ruger firearms and these guns in particular but am a bit disappointed that I buy two new guns and each has a problem right out of the gate.
Thanks in advance.
Dave
The problem is that on the .327 Single Seven after a couple of cylinders of shooting the pin holding the rear site in the frame is protruding at least a 1/4 inch if not more from the right side of the gun. Had I not noticed it while at the range the other day I might have lost it completely.
The second issue was on the 77/22. Right after getting the gun I purchased a new scope and proceeded to mount it. I noticed the front of the scope was touching the rear sight and it was not yet fully tightened. I turn the gun sideways and noticed that I have two different scope rings each of a differing height. The one in the rear is higher than the front mount, hence my problem with the rear sight. In looking at the manual that came with the gun both should have been the number four. One was a four and the other a five which is taller.
I call Ruger today with these issues and the nice lady said on the scope mount send it back and they will send me a new one. On the sight pin on the Single Seven she said apply some blue lock-tite to it and if that doesn't work send it in as the hole is too big. No offer to send me a shipping tag or pay for costs of shipping on either. Is this common for Ruger and is this what I should expect? Both are new guns with very little use on either.
The scope rings not too big a deal as I can send them in and hope someone sends me the right ones back. However on the .327, a brand new gun and I'm instructed to apply some lock-tite and see if it works. It's my thinking that it is a new gun and I expected it to work from the get go. I don't think I should have to be doing any hillbilly gunsmithing on a new gun. Again an easy fix, if it works, but it just kind of strikes me that if I can get one that is correct for the same price why keep the one with the enlarged pin hole and hope that my sight pin stays in place. And if not then I have to deal with it again in the near or distant future.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on these things. One should they be sending me shipping labels for the returns and two would you be using lock-tite on your new gun hoping it works or send it back for a replacement? I really do like Ruger firearms and these guns in particular but am a bit disappointed that I buy two new guns and each has a problem right out of the gate.
Thanks in advance.
Dave