A little "flex" isn't always a bad thing; in some circumstances, monolithic polymer lowers may do better than mil-spec aluminum receivers. Here's a case where a couple of ARs (one monolithic polymer, one mil-spec aluminum) got run over by a truck - the rifle with the polymer lower continued to function, but the mil-spec rifle was DOA:
https://sinistralrifleman.com/2012/04/06/cav-15-polymer-lower-receivers/
And FWIW here's an "abuse test" where they shot a polymer lower full of holes (obviously, a mil-spec buffer tube wouldn't likely function with that kind of damage):
https://sinistralrifleman.com/2014/03/18/gwacs-armory-cav-15-mkii-abuse-test/
View attachment 93426
A gunsmith I respect said he didn't like the CAV15 receivers for target rifles, because receiver flex could theoretically alter the relative positions of the hammer and trigger (but a 'cassette'-type trigger/FCG might address that concern). To each his own...
As always IMHO, FWIW, YMMV, one size never fits all, etc., etc.