9x19 said:
Thanks but I'll stick with MagPul... I know where they stand on anti-gun legislation.
Ok. I have been a LONG time lurker here, but this response has finally spurred me to write something.
Ruger is the largest domestic gun manufacturer in the country. They took the lead after the Newtown shooting by posting up prominently on their website the "protect your rights" link that allowed everyone to voice their concern to their elected officials. A year and a half ago, Ruger challenged everyone with the million gun challenge and not only met that, but beat it by almost 25%, donating almost one and a quarter MILLION dollars to the NRA.
How do YOU now figure that Ruger's offering of their own type of AR sights equals a lack of commitment to the fight for the second amendment?
Ruger is headquarters in Connecticut, but doesn't manufacture a single firearm there. As a matter of fact, I believe that they have fewer than 30 employees that reside and work in Southport. I'm sure, as a company, and as individuals, they are appalled by what the Connecticut legislature has done, but as a business, it really hasn't affected them, other than with the commercial sales within the boundaries of the state.
I personally find your comments narrow minded, and lacking any concept of business sense.
You spout off at the mouth like a toddler, yet have no concept of what it takes to run a company. I'm sure you believe that every gun company should quit selling guns in all the states that have recently passed new legislation, but haven't ever thought to boycot Ford, or Chevy for modifying their designs for sale in California.
As to your argument about Colt, Ruger produces the same number of guns in a WEEK, that Colt produces in a year. I ask you who has more to be concerned about?