Tallbald
Buckeye
I was unable to join any branch of our military and have no personal experience from which to draw. *From our hearts though Miss Penny and I work always to approach those we meet in uniform, wherever we may be, and offer them our thanks and gratitude for their selfless sacrifices on behalf of our freedom.
I watch true battle documentaries from historical interest, and film footage is particularly mesmerizing to me. Air combat always makes me wonder something however.
When personnel and non-combatants on the ground observe that overhead rages a fight with automatic weapon fire, rockets and such everywhere, do they attempt to take cover from stray aircraft or anti-aircraft rounds falling to Earth? A silly question perhaps but I don't remember any film documentary with actual footage taken from a ground position that shows people seeking cover from overhead fire not directed at them. I know and understand that pilots cannot always consider where a projectile may land except to hope it finds its intended target. And I understand that on the ground, fighters can be completely absorbed in their own fights and thus unable to contend with additional threats in the sky not directed at them in particular. Is distance from an air battle taken into account by ground forces when deciding to seek cover or not?
For those on the ground is the air battle sort of surreal,maybe not registering as an addressable threat? Or is it a situation where there's little that can be done to avoid the threat and it therefore is simply accepted?
I guess the person or crew filming events may discount air threats from stray projectiles in order to capture images. But I don't recall ever hearing much from narrators about ground casualties from overhead fire or hearing of orders to take cover being issued.
I appreciate informed education. Right now all I have is my own speculation. Don.
I watch true battle documentaries from historical interest, and film footage is particularly mesmerizing to me. Air combat always makes me wonder something however.
When personnel and non-combatants on the ground observe that overhead rages a fight with automatic weapon fire, rockets and such everywhere, do they attempt to take cover from stray aircraft or anti-aircraft rounds falling to Earth? A silly question perhaps but I don't remember any film documentary with actual footage taken from a ground position that shows people seeking cover from overhead fire not directed at them. I know and understand that pilots cannot always consider where a projectile may land except to hope it finds its intended target. And I understand that on the ground, fighters can be completely absorbed in their own fights and thus unable to contend with additional threats in the sky not directed at them in particular. Is distance from an air battle taken into account by ground forces when deciding to seek cover or not?
For those on the ground is the air battle sort of surreal,maybe not registering as an addressable threat? Or is it a situation where there's little that can be done to avoid the threat and it therefore is simply accepted?
I guess the person or crew filming events may discount air threats from stray projectiles in order to capture images. But I don't recall ever hearing much from narrators about ground casualties from overhead fire or hearing of orders to take cover being issued.
I appreciate informed education. Right now all I have is my own speculation. Don.