J. Yuma
Single-Sixer
well, i'm sure that they're gonna let you have guns, it's the ammo they're gonna tax into oblivion.
let's hopeThat would still be an infringement on the Second Amendment and the Supreme Court would shoot that down in a New York minute.
IMO, the problem IS the Supreme Court.That would still be an infringement on the Second Amendment and the Supreme Court would shoot that down in a New York minute.
What I've learned about law.The Supreme Court cannot make law. They only interpret and rule on cases presented to them. However, liberal judges can be quite damaging to our rights per their interpretation.
We need Constitutional judges throughout the judicial system.
yes, I am.If this is an issue, you're several years behind the curve.
Jefferson warned us about the judiciary ,IMO, the problem IS the Supreme Court.
The founding Fathers wrote documents that spoke clear English to a country of mostly illiterates and needed no interpretation then or now. Today we have a court that wriggles new "rights" into law that they have no business interpreting.
well, i'm sure that they're gonna let you have guns, it's the ammo they're gonna tax into oblivion.
wanted to "like," but it didn't seem appropriate to like.A man who knows told me Primers would be the first to go .
Because there is a 0% chance that person would win under any circumstance. They only pull votes from the viable candidate. It's throwing your vote away. Nobody is influenced by a protest vote.And BTW, did you know that there is an actual "Constitution Party", and that they have a candidate on this election ballot?....Wonder why hardly anyone ever even mentions anything about it, even on a gun forum?...Seems odd to me, but there it is.
DGW
Not quiteIMO, the problem IS the Supreme Court.
The founding Fathers wrote documents that spoke clear English to a country of mostly illiterates and needed no interpretation then or now. Today we have a court that wriggles new "rights" into law that they have no business interpreting.