New Subaru

graygun said:
You learned about interference engines the hard way. I changed the belt in my 93 Civic at about 96k. I believe the 1.8,which is the current engine and came out in 2006,has a chain.

Hi,

Actually I was lucky, Graygun--my personal experience was with a non-interference engine. Inconvenience, yes, destroyed engine, no. Others I've known didn't share my good luck. Glad to hear Honda's going to chains, too!

Rick C
 
Rick Courtright said:
graygun said:
You learned about interference engines the hard way. I changed the belt in my 93 Civic at about 96k. I believe the 1.8,which is the current engine and came out in 2006,has a chain.

Hi,

Actually I was lucky, Graygun--my personal experience was with a non-interference engine. Inconvenience, yes, destroyed engine, no. Others I've known didn't share my good luck. Glad to hear Honda's going to chains, too!

Rick C


Sorry,I should've taken a moment to reread that post. :oops: Maybe your friend to the north will give you a ride in his new Subaru. :)
 
The Forrester and rav were our short list a couple of months ago. Back to back test drives tanked the subie for us, especially the Mrs. I was willing to give the CVT a try but not her. We don't need the off-road ability in our car and truly liked the seats in the rav better. I really wanted to feel the subie love but the toy was a better fit. Oh well.

Good car, you should enjoy it for a long time.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top