Louisville UPS cargo plane crash.

ProfessorWes

Hawkeye
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
9,264
City & State/Province
Lake of the Ozarks, MO
time for ejection seats on some of those planes.

It would have to have a massive upward thrust G to get enough height for a parachute to open.

What a tragedy. Is 4:56 the time it actually happened?
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
No doubt some idiot will complain about not getting her UPS package.

That video looks horrible. Prayers for the families.
Yeah, you're right. Saw a post about it shortly after it happened, and several people thought it was funny enough to joke about missing their UPS packages. There are some sick puppies out there anymore.
 
7 dead, 11 seriously injured as of this morning.

https://www.news4jax.com/news/natio...about-the-deadly-ups-plane-crash-in-kentucky/

This pic shows the hundreds of yards the plane skidded thru everything:

1762340995099.webp
 
Last edited:
Awful.

NOT,,, repeat not downplaying the injuries or loss of life,, but it's a miracle that number isn't much higher.
Latest from local news: 9 dead, 11 injures, at least 16 missing.

https://www.wlky.com/article/plane-crash-explosion-louisville-airport/69255042

As of Wednesday morning, at least nine people are dead and 11 injured, and at least 16 people are still missing. There are two people in critical condition and eight with non-life-threatening injuries at UofL hospitals.


Gov. Andy Beshear said he expects those numbers to grow.
 
This morning I read that "witnesses" saw an engine on the left wing on fire during take-off roll (before nose up). If so, not sure why the tower would not have called that out immediately (?).

J.
 
I'm sure you're correct on that one... Controllers are now busier than a puppy in a room full of bouncing balls.

J.
The other possible explanation is the age of the plane. It's 34 years old, with a lot of takeoffs and landings. Maintenance & inspections under those conditions may not have been what it should be. The NTSB will be looking into that.
 
This morning I read that "witnesses" saw an engine on the left wing on fire during take-off roll (before nose up). If so, not sure why the tower would not have called that out immediately (?).

J.
Maybe they did but might have been too late to abort, aircraft also have engine fire alert warnings again maybe the issue of not enough runway to stop. No doubt it was heavily laden going to Hawaii

Max fuel load- approx 38,000 gallons, thats about 250,000lbs
 
This morning I read that "witnesses" saw an engine on the left wing on fire during take-off roll (before nose up). If so, not sure why the tower would not have called that out immediately (?).

J.
The left engine , per photos and news reports, detached and its not at the crash site. The photo looks like its next to runway and has grass embedded on it.

ETA Back in 1979 the left engine on a different model McDonald Douglas jet fell off just after take off. AA flight 191 from O' Hare to DFW.
 
Catastrophic engine failure. It is assumed that an engine on fire is still producing thrust. You work the procedures quickly, correctly and with some luck you get a little altitude, then work on the fire. Engine sitting off the runway was of no use and with extensive wing damage, there was no way that airplane was going to fly. Not that heavy.
 
Catastrophic engine failure. It is assumed that an engine on fire is still producing thrust. You work the procedures quickly, correctly and with some luck you get a little altitude, then work on the fire. Engine sitting off the runway was of no use and with extensive wing damage, there was no way that airplane was going to fly. Not that heavy.
And if the engine came off before takeoff, it probably would’ve damaged the fuel cutoff in the pylon. It would’ve been spewing fuel into the fire.

I saw somewhere this place didn’t fly for 5-6 weeks in Sep/Oct. The presumption was it was in for maintenance.
Could be, but it could’ve been simply parked due to not being needed.
 
Maybe they did but might have been too late to abort, aircraft also have engine fire alert warnings again maybe the issue of not enough runway to stop. No doubt it was heavily laden going to Hawaii

Max fuel load- approx 38,000 gallons, thats about 250,000lbs
I think you will find that it was 38,00 pounds of fuel, which is about 5800 gallons. Jet fuel is measured by the pounds and JP-4/5 is about 6.5 lbs per gallon
 
That was a DC-10, the older sibling of the MD-11. A L-1011, another tri-jet lost an engine back around 1970.
I'm aware of the model of the Chicago crash.
A VP of sales I worked with had a ticket for AA flight 191.
He fortunately changed his flight plans.
 
Some of the news reports I've seen last night and today, indicated that the flight was delayed two hours while mechanics worked on the number one engine . . . the same one that allegedly fell off the plane during the takeoff run.

Foreign-object damage from Number One coming apart may have done for the other engine as well.

Not much you can do at that point.
 
I think you will find that it was 38,00 pounds of fuel, which is about 5800 gallons. Jet fuel is measured by the pounds and JP-4/5 is about 6.5 lbs per gallon
No sir. It was 38615 gallons & apparently they use 6.7 lbs per gallon so the fuel weight was 258721 lbs., per the F model specs. JP4 & 5 run approx 6.4 to 6.5 lb/gal.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top