Looking for a Single Six .22 Magnum Cylinder- Questions

Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
193
City & State/Province
TEXAS
After my father passed, I ran across a 1969 production 3-Screw Single Six in his lot of firearms. It has the .22 LR but is missing the .22 Magnum cylinder and I'd like to find one. The rear of the .22 LR cylinder is recessed but every .22 Mag cylinder I've found is not. So the question is- Are the rear of .22 Magnum cylinders supposed to be recessed too and I just haven't found one yet or are they flat?

Thanks for the help!
 
Sent my single-six from 1973 back to Ruger for failure to fire problems. While it was there I asked them for a 22Mag cylinder. I think it was $160, but I'm assured that it would have no timing issues. I know people who have bought cylinders and they just worked, but the piece of mind of knowing that Ruger checked mine out was worth the cash.
 
H[ as far as i know all the mag cyls are only recessed for the rim to fit in not all the way around the only difference is the length of the cyls and the old models had flutes from the start of magnums to early 1973 so measure the length of your LR cyl and you will know what to look for I have two fluted mag cyls that i would let go if they are the right length but they have some pitting on the outsides
Gramps
 
After my father passed, I ran across a 1969 production 3-Screw Single Six in his lot of firearms. It has the .22 LR but is missing the .22 Magnum cylinder and I'd like to find one. The rear of the .22 LR cylinder is recessed but every .22 Mag cylinder I've found is not. So the question is- Are the rear of .22 Magnum cylinders supposed to be recessed too and I just haven't found one yet or are they flat?

Thanks for the help!
See my posts here ---> CLICK THIS LINK
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
OM vs NM .22 cyl body lengths:

“Early” OLD Models Lightweights and pre lightweights measure 1.390” +/- in the body length,

“mid” old models beginning about 1960 are 1.405” +/-,

"late" old models and those in new model guns are 1.410" +/-.


The change from old design to new design vs OM/NM guns:

Did Ruger use up blued Old Model, old style cyls by shipping with New Model blue guns? Some blue cyls were.

They weren't all left over old model cyls in blue: they were continued to be made in the old style design and began being made in stainless (there were no OM stainless guns or cylinders). In other words, the change in cyl design had nothing to do with the New Model change, it wasn't simultaneously introduced and not until after introduction of the New Model SA design!

You can call them "new model or new style cylinders" but they were not part of the "New Model line" of single action transfer bar safety gun re-design. They were a later and separate production design change.

All of the Old Model Super SS and Single-Six had fluted 22 and 22 Mag cylinders. The non-fluted Mag cylinders started in 1975, after the New Models were introduced in 1973 for the Blue guns and in 1976-1977 for the Stainless Steel guns. The elimination of the firing pin groove in the 22 LR cylinder does not coincide with the introduction of the non fluted Mag cylinders but there are transition guns with both old type cylinders or an old type LR cyl. with the new non-fluted type Mag cylinder. The blue guns switched to the new type cylinders around 64-15000 to 64-17xxx c. 1975 or so before the 1976 Liberty marking and the stainless guns switched about 64-70000 c.1977, after the Liberty marked guns.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top