LARGE RIFLE PRIMERS???

chuck

Blackhawk
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
964
City & State/Province
Oregon
30 years ago i stoped useing CCI primers, got a lot of vertical stringing, are they still bad or have the got their stuff together and make a good primer??
 
I quit using CCI primers back in the late 70's due to QC issues and aint looked back.
Today I'm mostly a Winchester fan, the exception being precision loads meant for extended distances (300 yds and beyound). For that, you'd be hard pressed to beat Federal's Gold Medal (match) primers.

DGW
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I'll go with DGW, similar results. WW makes and loads thir ammo with ball powder. All their primers are hot enough to ignite BLC2. I had hang fires with CCI, read the books suggested I use MAGNUM primers. I changed to WW LR primers, never looked back. I have been completely satisfied with them in all calibers I load, from Small Pistol to WW209 shotgun primers. I only sell WW primers in my shop. No complaints form my customers.
 
I only use CCI today in a certain 204 varmint rifle, because it likes to punch holes in primers. The only problem I ever had with them is when using firearms with lightened hammer springs...
 
I gave up on CCI. Bought 5000 and had nothing but trouble with them being oversized. Keep getting stuck in Dillon progressive and even Dillon recommends something else. I 'm slowly using up the rest (4K left) with a Lee hand primer and I'd guess about 1 in 10 will not go all the way in the primer pocket.

This is Large Pistol in 45 acp/colt.
 
Hi,

Normally I use W-W primers, but I think there are some CCIs gathering dust in the back of the closet.

Only worrisome thing I've ever seen w/ CCIs was back in my trapshooting days: the harder cups of their shotshell primers were tough on the "softer" firing pins found in a certain popular Italian trap gun. My gunsmith boss suggested Federals for all the single barrels, and W-W for the O/Us IF there was a misfire problem on the lower barrel (combination of firing pin angle and more rounded cup of the Federals affected a few guns.)

That's all I know of CCI "problems"...

Rick C
 
Lee Martin said:
How do you know the primer caused the stringing? Lots of variables at play here. I've used CCIs for years without any problem.

Because I've done extensive "back to back" testing out of my NRA Service Match rifle using various primers in conjunction with "all else equal" handloads. The difference on the target began to plainly show up at 200 yds. At 300 yds and beyound, the difference was even plainer (and more than enough to matter).
Point is, if ya want precision rifle ammo, ya gotta use a precision primer. In my experience, CCI's aint.

Hope this helped.

DGW
 
Sam Summey said:
I'll go with DGW, similar results. WW makes and loads thir ammo with ball powder. All their primers are hot enough to ignite BLC2.

Hi,

This brings up something I heard years ago. Might be pure bunk, I dunno. If someone can shed any light on whether it is, it would be appreciated.

The story was that one should look at the brand of primer and the mfr of the powders used in factory ammo, then keep one's handloads somewhat "family" oriented for optimum results. At the time, Winchester (Olin) made their own primers and powder, and all their factory ammo obviously used W-W components.

Remington (ammo division, at least) was part of DuPont, so Rem primers and IMR powders were what you'd find in their metallic ammo. I'm sure their shotshells used DuPont powders but whether they were even close to those we could buy as handloaders, I dunno.

Federal used a lot of Hercules (Alliant) powders, as I understood it, at least in their shotshells. So using Federal primers w/ Hercules-Alliant powders would make sense.

CCI wasn't allied w/ any particular powder mfr, so some experimenting was required to figure a good match...

Anyone ever heard anything along these lines?

Rick C
 
Back
Top