TitanX said:
CC,
I've noticed the same thing watching Perry Mason. I knew I couldn't be alone in wondering.
I looked it up, and 'incompetent' essentially means 'having nothing to do with the case', which in my mind is irrelevant.
I believe it once had a shade of different meaning, but I've NEVER seen or heard it in modern courtrooms (Court TV, real life kibitzing, etc.).
On other related issues with PM:
It's amazing to see representations of a time before 'full disclosure'.
I can't believe how many times Mason objects on legit legal issues, and then proceeds to singlehandedly GIVE TESTIMONY and an ALTERNATE THEORY of the case.
He ALWAYS solves the case, in court, by forcing a confession of someone on the stand - I've NEVER seen a case go to the jury (after all, it's a half hour show).
I actually looked that up and saw the same thing. So as you said, incompetent and irrelevant actually mean the same thing so why use the two terms together.
I know what you mean by those confessions on the stand. There were also a lot of people in the observers seats that jumped up and spewed out a heart felt confession. Mason was good at getting that. I also got tired of hearing the phrase "I didn't kill her, I loved her". I guess that automatically makes one innocent. But it was an interesting show.
I guess Mason always won his cases because no one expected any one named Ham Burger to win his case. By the way it took me 30 years to figure out that if they used a nickname for him it would be Ham.